Hi,
You can clone the current tree from:
git clone git://git.debian.org/git/apt-listbugs/apt-listbugs.git
After you commit changes with git commit, 'git format-patch origin -o
some-directory/' will create Git patches (formatted as email) to send
to me via email which I can apply to my repository.
On Tue, 07 Oct 2008 23:30:18 -0700 Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> Hi,
Hi Junichi,
>
> I obviously do not have enough time to test this patch and maintain
> it. Are you interested in maintaining apt-listbugs (in co-maintenance
> mode probably?)
Thank you very much for the offer.
I am interested in co
Hi,
I obviously do not have enough time to test this patch and maintain
it. Are you interested in maintaining apt-listbugs (in co-maintenance
mode probably?)
At Tue, 2 Sep 2008 00:18:25 +0200,
Francesco Poli wrote:
>
> diff -ruN c/aptcleanup g/aptcleanup
> --- c/aptcleanup 2008-05-13 00:0
On Sat, 14 Jun 2008 16:12:17 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
> The attached patch modifies /usr/share/apt-listbugs/aptcleanup in order
> to let it behave as I previously explained.
The attached patch is an updated version.
I added a little check, since I found out that a pinned package could
b
tag 473175 patch
thanks
On Sun, 20 Apr 2008 18:55:12 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Apr 2008 16:27:58 +0900 Junichi Uekawa wrote:
[...]
> > Your logic sounds reasonable, patch is welcome. It's going to be a
> > major rewrite since aptcleanup currently is a very simple script.
>
> I ha
On Sun, 20 Apr 2008 16:27:58 +0900 Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> Hi,
Hi! :)
>
> > Again assuming that the above is correct, I don't think that this logic
> > is appropriate for aptcleanup.
[...]
> > I think the design of aptcleanup could be changed as follows.
[...]
> > 1.2.1) query the BTS
Hi,
> Again assuming that the above is correct, I don't think that this logic
> is appropriate for aptcleanup. That is to say, I don't think that
> waiting for the pinned package to be non-RC-buggy before unpinning it
> is the right thing to do.
>
> The reason is: when I ask apt-listbugs to pin a
On Sat, 12 Apr 2008 16:27:28 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
> IIUC, aptcleanup parses /etc/apt/preferences and creates a list of
> pinned packages.
> Then aptcleanup queries the BTS (by invoking apt-listbugs on the list of
> pinned packages) in order to see whether the currently pinned packages
On Sun, 30 Mar 2008 11:18:44 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
> Why do I get different results from the ones you get?!?
> Why?!?
>
> What's wrong with my system?
I performed some other checks in order to understand what's going on.
I think I found what's wrong with aptcleanup.
IIUC, aptcleanup
On Sun, 30 Mar 2008 13:58:08 +0900 Junichi Uekawa wrote:
[...]
> I've ran it with your data, and does the expected stuff. apt bug
> isn't fixed yet, fontconfig bug is now fixed. Apparently
> 'Explanation' isn't edited by aptcleanup (it can be edited by user),
> so although only a part of the pro
Hi,
> The system executes cron.daily scripts via anacron everyday, but nothing
> seems to change in this file.
> However:
>
> * #454965 and #452718 were merged together and then downgraded from
> severity `serious' to `important' (on Sun, 23 Mar 2008)
> * fontconfig (version 2.5.0-2, c
Package: apt-listbugs
Version: 0.0.86
Severity: important
Hi and thanks for maintaining apt-listbugs!
I am experiencing a problem with its cron.daily script, though.
Some time ago, I pinned two packages in order to avoid installing
versions affected by a couple of bugs which I thought could have
12 matches
Mail list logo