Hi Rogier,
On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 11:27:00 +0200
Rogier Wolff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 11:03:19AM +0200, Martin Pels wrote:
> >
> > Which patch are you looking at?
>
> The wrong one apparently.
Ok, I'm glad that's sorted :-)
>
> > The one Mark attached to his messag
Hi Rogier,
On Tue, 15 Apr 2008 18:35:00 +0200
Rogier Wolff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> In my version we currently open sockets on line 327, drop permissions
> on line 333, and call srand and further things around 345. Which
> version are you looking at. (I'm in my 0.74 directory, which is
>
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 05:56:36PM +0200, Martin Pels wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Apr 2008 17:15:18 +0200
> Rogier Wolff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 04:41:15PM +0200, Martin Pels wrote:
> > > Depending on whether IP_HDRINCL is defined net_preopen() creates an
> > > icmp and ud
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 05:56:36PM +0200, Martin Pels wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Apr 2008 17:15:18 +0200
> Rogier Wolff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 04:41:15PM +0200, Martin Pels wrote:
> > > Depending on whether IP_HDRINCL is defined net_preopen() creates an
> > > icmp and ud
On Tue, 15 Apr 2008 17:15:18 +0200
Rogier Wolff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 04:41:15PM +0200, Martin Pels wrote:
> > Depending on whether IP_HDRINCL is defined net_preopen() creates an
> > icmp and udp socket, or a single raw socket.
> >
> > If we have two sockets it is
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 04:41:15PM +0200, Martin Pels wrote:
> Depending on whether IP_HDRINCL is defined net_preopen() creates an
> icmp and udp socket, or a single raw socket.
>
> If we have two sockets it is trivial to close them in
> net_selectsocket(). This is actually what I did in the firs
Hi Rogier,
Thanks for the reply.
On Mon, 14 Apr 2008 21:09:56 +0200
Rogier Wolff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi guys,
>
> Looks nice. One problem I have with this is that the amount of code
> that is exposed to security problems has gone up a factor of ten...
>
> How much work would it b
Hi guys,
Looks nice. One problem I have with this is that the amount of code
that is exposed to security problems has gone up a factor of ten...
How much work would it be to open both the new UDP port and the old
ICMP port, and discard the one we don't need? How can the program
switch (with th
> I wrote a patch for Mtr 0.72 to implement UDP support. You can find it
> attached. UDP mode is enabled using the "-u" commandline switch, or by
> typing u in the GUI. The patch has been tested on Debian
> testing/unstable, both on IPv4 and IPv6.
I have written a patch (see attached) as well that
Subject: mtr: UDP patch
Package: mtr
Version: 0.72
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Hi,
I wrote a patch for Mtr 0.72 to implement UDP support. You can find it
attached. UDP mode is enabled using the "-u" commandline switch, or by
typing u in the GUI. The patch has been tested on Debian
testing/unst
10 matches
Mail list logo
