2012/4/5 Amos Blanton :
> No problem. The license will be updated in the next version of the source
> package: 1.4.0.5. (Which I will release as soon as I address other small
> issues that have come up.)
>
> If you find anything else, let me know.
Cool! You're great! :)
Greetings,
Miry
--
To
No problem. The license will be updated in the next version of the
source package: 1.4.0.5. (Which I will release as soon as I address
other small issues that have come up.)
If you find anything else, let me know.
On 04/05/2012 11:35 AM, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
I've just found out something that m
I've just found out something that might be a problem:
Scratch Support materials (/Help), sample Media files (/Media), and
sample projects (/Projects), are licensed under the Creative Commons
Attribution-ShareAlike 2.0 Generic (CC BY-SA 2.0) license. To view a
copy of this license, visit
http://cr
2012/4/5 Amos Blanton :
>> According to strace, when running scratch on the latest squeak-vm the
>> system seems to be waiting forever to several resources that do not
>> exist:
>> - /usr/share/icons/DMZ-White/cursors/041870e1c79f7f3e7cc803061830
>> - /usr/share/pixmaps/DMZ-White/cursors/04187
On 04/04/2012 06:01 AM, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
Hi,
According to strace, when running scratch on the latest squeak-vm the
system seems to be waiting forever to several resources that do not
exist:
- /usr/share/icons/DMZ-White/cursors/041870e1c79f7f3e7cc803061830
- /usr/share/pixmaps/DMZ-White/cu
> A more fundamental issue could be a potential show stopper. Take a look
> at the etoys package -- technically similar, FOSS license, but still in
> non-free.
This sounds like confusion. In any case, the FTP masters are a
different group now and I think this is tractable.
Regards,
Mako
--
Be
On 04/04/2012 08:18 AM, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
2012/4/4 Michael Hanke :
On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 12:08:17PM +0200, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
2012/4/4 Benj. Mako Hill :
I also think that the current text describing the t
On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 12:08:17PM +0200, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
> 2012/4/4 Benj. Mako Hill :
> > I also think that the current text describing the trademark license
> > make it clear that re-packaging is fine while using the marks (it
> > says as much) so I don't forsee that this will be a problem get
2012/4/4 Michael Hanke :
> On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 12:08:17PM +0200, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
>> 2012/4/4 Benj. Mako Hill :
>> > I also think that the current text describing the trademark license
>> > make it clear that re-packaging is fine while using the marks (it
>> > says as much) so I don't forsee
2012/4/4 Benj. Mako Hill :
> I'm pretty sure that the changes to the website make it clear that the
> website terms of use and the trademark license are not additional
> copyright terms.
>
> I also think that the current text describing the trademark license
> make it clear that re-packaging is fin
2012/3/31 Allison Randal :
> On 03/30/2012 04:10 PM, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
>> It works for me with squeak-vm 4.0.3.2202 (squeeze) but when trying to
>> run it on squeak-vm 4.4.7 (wheezy) I just get a black screen [1] [2]
>>
>> According to jredrejo, the modification causing this problem might be
>> re
> We've made some changes to page that describes the source code on our site,
> and also made a minor update to a license file in the source package, all
> based on suggestions from Mako Hill and friends from the free software
> community.
>
> http://info.scratch.mit.edu/Source_Code
>
> I hope w
On 03/30/2012 04:10 PM, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
> It works for me with squeak-vm 4.0.3.2202 (squeeze) but when trying to
> run it on squeak-vm 4.4.7 (wheezy) I just get a black screen [1] [2]
>
> According to jredrejo, the modification causing this problem might be
> related to the changes made to the
2012/3/30 Allison Randal :
> >From the Ubuntu side, my only question is how far along are the changes
> to run on the Ubuntu squeak packages instead of bundling a version of
> the squeak VM in the scratch packages? I see the work mainly around
> revisions 78-79 in the scratch packaging svn on Assem
Hi Allison, Miry -
We've made some changes to page that describes the source code on our site,
and also made a minor update to a license file in the source package, all
based on suggestions from Mako Hill and friends from the free software
community.
http://info.scratch.mit.edu/Source_Code
I hop
On 03/28/2012 10:35 PM, Allison Randal wrote:
Double-check on the DFSG and the Scratch trademark policy. The code
itself will be fine under the DFSG, but the trademark policy may not
satisfy "The license must allow modifications and derived works, and
must allow them to be distributed under the
> 2012/3/28 Amos Blanton :
>> The Scratch Team has re-released the Scratch 1.4 source code under the GPL
>> v2.
This is great news! :)
On 03/28/2012 01:34 PM, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
> Yay! I'm going to package it for Debian
Double-check on the DFSG and the Scratch trademark policy. The code
itself w
17 matches
Mail list logo
