Bug#467454: some modules unnecessarily built-in

2008-07-28 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 04:54:34PM +0300, Riku Voipio wrote: > On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 01:52:27PM -0700, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > > P.S. Riku posted an interesting message asking whether we could > > replace the versatile flavour with a more popular ARM arch that is > > also emulated by qemu. > >

Bug#467454: some modules unnecessarily built-in

2008-07-28 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 01:52:27PM -0700, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > * Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-02-26 12:07]: > > > The following modules are built into the core image and > > > probably shouldn't be: > > > > > > scsi_mod > > > sd_mod > > > ext3 > > > ext2 > > > jbd > > > SMC91X dri

Bug#467454: some modules unnecessarily built-in

2008-07-27 Thread Riku Voipio
On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 01:52:27PM -0700, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > P.S. Riku posted an interesting message asking whether we could > replace the versatile flavour with a more popular ARM arch that is > also emulated by qemu. That would either be the pxa zauruses or omap2. But that could be a bit

Bug#467454: some modules unnecessarily built-in

2008-07-26 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-02-26 12:07]: > > The following modules are built into the core image and > > probably shouldn't be: > > > > scsi_mod > > sd_mod > > ext3 > > ext2 > > jbd > > SMC91X driver (don't know the module name, but config option is > > CONFIG_SMC91X) > > > > Th

Bug#467454: some modules unnecessarily built-in

2008-02-27 Thread Aurelien Jarno
Robert Millan a écrit : On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 02:10:09PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote: On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 01:46:47PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote: It does work, but there is currently no support for the versatile platform in d-i. Therefore the solution is to use the initrd.gz from another p

Bug#467454: some modules unnecessarily built-in

2008-02-27 Thread Robert Millan
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 02:10:09PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote: > On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 01:46:47PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > It does work, but there is currently no support for the versatile > > platform in d-i. Therefore the solution is to use the initrd.gz from > > another platform, which

Bug#467454: some modules unnecessarily built-in

2008-02-26 Thread Bastian Blank
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 01:46:47PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > It does work, but there is currently no support for the versatile > platform in d-i. Therefore the solution is to use the initrd.gz from > another platform, which does not contain the necessary modules from > versatile. Please respo

Bug#467454: some modules unnecessarily built-in

2008-02-26 Thread Bastian Blank
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 01:46:47PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > It does work, but there is currently no support for the versatile > platform in d-i. Therefore the solution is to use the initrd.gz from > another platform, which does not contain the necessary modules from > versatile. So it is a w

Bug#467454: some modules unnecessarily built-in

2008-02-26 Thread Robert Millan
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 01:46:47PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > The fix is to add support for the versatile platform to d-i, but > unfortunately I don't have enough time currently. FYI I'm currently looking into this. Doesn't look hard, and it's a small effort. I can ping this bug when it's

Bug#467454: some modules unnecessarily built-in

2008-02-26 Thread Aurelien Jarno
Bastian Blank a écrit : > On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 12:07:01PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote: >> They are actually needed until there is real support for versatile to >> d-i. This way it is possible to use the initrd.gz from another platform >> instead. > > The kernel is built with initramfs support.

Bug#467454: some modules unnecessarily built-in

2008-02-26 Thread Robert Millan
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 12:17:31PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote: > On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 12:07:01PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > They are actually needed until there is real support for versatile to > > d-i. This way it is possible to use the initrd.gz from another platform > > instead. > > Th

Bug#467454: some modules unnecessarily built-in

2008-02-26 Thread Bastian Blank
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 12:07:01PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > They are actually needed until there is real support for versatile to > d-i. This way it is possible to use the initrd.gz from another platform > instead. The kernel is built with initramfs support. Do you want to say that it does n

Bug#467454: some modules unnecessarily built-in

2008-02-26 Thread Aurelien Jarno
Robert Millan a écrit : > Package: linux-image-2.6.24-1-versatile > Version: 2.6.24-4 > Severity: normal > > The following modules are built into the core image and > probably shouldn't be: > > scsi_mod > sd_mod > ext3 > ext2 > jbd > SMC91X driver (don't know the module name, but config option is

Bug#467454: some modules unnecessarily built-in

2008-02-25 Thread Robert Millan
Package: linux-image-2.6.24-1-versatile Version: 2.6.24-4 Severity: normal The following modules are built into the core image and probably shouldn't be: scsi_mod sd_mod ext3 ext2 jbd SMC91X driver (don't know the module name, but config option is CONFIG_SMC91X) -- System Information: Debian Rel