Bug#463043: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: coreutils problem]

2008-02-06 Thread Manoj Srivastava
Hi, A new version of libselinux has been uploaded to incoming. This is still 2.0.35, thee last release, and not the CVS head of 2.0.49 in rawhide, but I do think the bug will be soon fixed. manoj -- Memories of you remind me of you. Karl Lehenbauer Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROT

Bug#463043: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: coreutils problem]

2008-01-29 Thread Jan Moringen
Hi Jim, > Thank you for the analysis and patch. You're welcome. Thank you for the quick fix. It works fine for me. > I preferred to do it slightly differently, > mainly to keep the work-around code in one place. I think the proposed patch was written by Micheal as I did not include any patch in

Bug#463043: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: coreutils problem]

2008-01-29 Thread Jim Meyering
Michael Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I can readily duplicate this bug report on a 2.6.24-rc7 kernel by > running `ls -l /proc/sys/fs/inotify` > > Kernel bug? libselinux bug? Documentation bug? > > I suppose coreutils should check that the returned context is non-NULL. > It looks like the debi

Bug#463043: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: coreutils problem]

2008-01-28 Thread Michael Stone
I can readily duplicate this bug report on a 2.6.24-rc7 kernel by running `ls -l /proc/sys/fs/inotify` Kernel bug? libselinux bug? Documentation bug? I suppose coreutils should check that the returned context is non-NULL. It looks like the debian 5.97-5.3 selinux patch (derived from redhat)