On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 04:53:26PM -0500, Michael Stone wrote:
My brain was obviously melting when I wrote that; too many archs
beginning with m. :-D There does probably need to be a special case for
m68k, but it probably has nothing to do with mips on irix. It may be
necessary to *also* do som
On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 09:41:43AM -0500, Michael Stone wrote:
I suspect that the key part is "MIPS" rather than "IRIX", and it should
be something like
- #ifdef __sgi
+ #if defined __sgi || defined __m68k
Currently waiting for compilation on m68k to test that theory.
My brain was obviously
On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 03:31:44PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Which failed tests for mips on irix are you referring to?
I'm referring to the code of the test:
/* On MIPS IRIX machines, LDBL_MIN_EXP is -1021, but the smallest reliable
exponent for 'long double' is -964. Similarly, on Power
On 23/01/08 at 08:30 -0500, Michael Stone wrote:
> Package: coreutils
> Version: 6.10-1
>
> http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?&pkg=coreutils&ver=6.10-1&arch=m68k&stamp=1201082218&file=log
>
> Looks like there's logic in the failed tests for mips on irix, which
> probably should be extended to mip
Package: coreutils
Version: 6.10-1
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?&pkg=coreutils&ver=6.10-1&arch=m68k&stamp=1201082218&file=log
Looks like there's logic in the failed tests for mips on irix, which
probably should be extended to mips on linux.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTE
5 matches
Mail list logo
