Bug#460108: #460108 lynx objects to path of valid cookies

2009-11-25 Thread Thomas Dickey
This is addressed in 2.8.8dev.2 -- Thomas E. Dickey http://invisible-island.net ftp://invisible-island.net signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#460108: #460108 lynx objects to path of valid cookies

2009-11-23 Thread Richard Kettlewell
Thomas Dickey wrote: On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 09:17:00AM +, Richard Kettlewell wrote: Thomas Dickey wrote: without the trace file attached to the bug report, no one can tell if we're discussing the same thing. Attached. ttfn/rjk Lynx Trace Log (2.8.7dev.9) ... Here's

Bug#460108: #460108 lynx objects to path of valid cookies

2009-11-23 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 09:17:00AM +, Richard Kettlewell wrote: > Thomas Dickey wrote: > > >without the trace file attached to the bug report, no one can tell > >if we're discussing the same thing. > > Attached. > > ttfn/rjk > Lynx Trace Log (2.8.7dev.9) ... Here's the line s

Bug#460108: #460108 lynx objects to path of valid cookies

2009-11-23 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Mon, 23 Nov 2009, Richard Kettlewell wrote: Thomas Dickey wrote: On Sun, 22 Nov 2009, Richard Kettlewell wrote: (a trace file from Lynx running with disorder would show the corresponding POST or GET, with the path). I think you must be confused - the HTTP request does not contain the p

Bug#460108: #460108 lynx objects to path of valid cookies

2009-11-23 Thread Richard Kettlewell
Thomas Dickey wrote: On Sun, 22 Nov 2009, Richard Kettlewell wrote: (a trace file from Lynx running with disorder would show the corresponding POST or GET, with the path). I think you must be confused - the HTTP request does not contain the path. The bug is in Lynx's handling of the respon

Bug#460108: #460108 lynx objects to path of valid cookies

2009-11-22 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Sun, 22 Nov 2009, Richard Kettlewell wrote: (a trace file from Lynx running with disorder would show the corresponding POST or GET, with the path). I think you must be confused - the HTTP request does not contain the path. The bug is in Lynx's handling of the response. You might consider

Bug#460108: #460108 lynx objects to path of valid cookies

2009-11-22 Thread Richard Kettlewell
Thomas Dickey wrote: Perhaps (by the way, I'd not have used the term "incorrect" if I'd made the report, since that prejudges the issue). I don't see a package for disorder, and can only guess which upstream source it might be. Reading http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2109/rfc2109.txt I see in

Bug#460108: #460108 lynx objects to path of valid cookies

2009-11-22 Thread Thomas Dickey
Perhaps (by the way, I'd not have used the term "incorrect" if I'd made the report, since that prejudges the issue). I don't see a package for disorder, and can only guess which upstream source it might be. Reading http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2109/rfc2109.txt I see in section 5.1 several exa