On 19/01/2008 Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> [Jonas Meurer]
> > I think that your patch is not enough. cryptdisks-early needs to be
> > started before and stopped after lvm, evms, raid, etc.
> > cryptdisks needs to be started after and stopped before lvm, evms, raid,
> > etc.
>
> Make sense to me.
[Jonas Meurer]
> I think that your patch is not enough. cryptdisks-early needs to be
> started before and stopped after lvm, evms, raid, etc.
> cryptdisks needs to be started after and stopped before lvm, evms, raid,
> etc.
Make sense to me. I would recommend an optional depend on both lvm
and lv
On 04/01/2008 Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> [Petter Reinholdtsen]
> > This patch change this to be the case, and make sure the two scripts
> > are started in the order cryptdisk-early, cryptdisk, and stopped in
> > the opposite order even when dependency based boot sequencing is
> > used.
>
> On se
[Petter Reinholdtsen]
> This patch change this to be the case, and make sure the two scripts
> are started in the order cryptdisk-early, cryptdisk, and stopped in
> the opposite order even when dependency based boot sequencing is
> used.
On second thought, and to reduce the complexity of initscrip
Package: cryptsetup
Version: 2:1.0.6~pre1-1
Tags: patch
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: incorrect-dependency
When testing dependency based boot sequencing, I discovered what I
believe is a minor bug in the init.d/cryptdisk script. Because of its
current dependencies, it is inserted w
5 matches
Mail list logo
