Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 11:07:58PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 07:51:43AM +1000, Paul Gear wrote:
>>> I assume by kerneloops you mean the ksymoops package? Is there anything
>>> special i need to do to enable serial output?
>> no i mean th
On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 11:07:58PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 07:51:43AM +1000, Paul Gear wrote:
> > I assume by kerneloops you mean the ksymoops package? Is there anything
> > special i need to do to enable serial output?
>
> no i mean the kerneloops package.
>
>
On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 07:51:43AM +1000, Paul Gear wrote:
> I assume by kerneloops you mean the ksymoops package? Is there anything
> special i need to do to enable serial output?
no i mean the kerneloops package.
yes a serial cable and the corresponding console boot arg.
> > sorry for loosin
maximilian attems wrote:
> ...
>> My report is bizarre to you because i am only typing out what is on the
>> screen manually. I have no experience in kernel debugging. I read
>> these pages:
>
> i see, well yes without serial or netconsole the ouptut cannot be
> really processed.
>
>> http://k
[ changed cc from mailinglist to the bug report ]
On Fri, 18 Jan 2008, Paul Gear wrote:
> My report is bizarre to you because i am only typing out what is on the
> screen manually. I have no experience in kernel debugging. I read
> these pages:
i see, well yes without serial or netconsole the
Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 10:10:15AM +1000, Paul Gear wrote:
>> RIP free_pages_bulk
> [...]
>> RIP: kmem_cache_free
> [...]
>> RIP: refresh_cpu_vm_stats
>> general protection fault: [2] SMP
>> CPU 1
>
> This looks like broken memory or other component.
That might be a go
On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 10:10:15AM +1000, Paul Gear wrote:
> RIP free_pages_bulk
[...]
> RIP: kmem_cache_free
[...]
> RIP: refresh_cpu_vm_stats
> general protection fault: [2] SMP
> CPU 1
This looks like broken memory or other component.
Bastian
--
Actual war is a very messy business. Ver
[ kicked d-kernel cc, bug reports land anyway there ]
On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 10:08:43AM +1000, Paul Gear wrote:
> 2.6.24rc6 has fared no better on my machine:
rc7 is out.
your report are still a bit bizarre as if some lines were
cut out, please try rc7 and install kerneloops + let it
report to
Here are some summaries of panics on recent kernels with & without irqpoll.
2.6.24rc6 with irqpoll
--
Call Trace: mmput do_exit oops_end kernel_math_error error_exit
get_page_from_freelist sock_sendmsg find_lock_page __alloc_pages
do_wp_cache handle_mm_fault sk_free wake_up_bi
2.6.24rc6 has fared no better on my machine:
DR0: DR1: DR2:
DR3: DR6: 0ff0 DR7: 0400
Process modprobe (pid: 2064, threadinfo 8102585c000, task
81012779c040)
Stack: 810127678a40 81012be8930 0
On Sun, 30 Dec 2007, Paul Gear wrote:
>
> 2.6.23-1-amd64 (dpkg version 2.6.23-2) panics also.
>
there is newer available 2.6.24-rc6 linux images
see trunk apt snapshots
http://wiki.debian.org/DebianKernel
please test them out.
--
maks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
maximilian attems wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Dec 2007, Paul Gear wrote:
>
>> Hi kernel team,
>>
>> Just wondering if you have any thoughts on this bug yet. It is a high
>> priority bug (as it prevents the system from booting), but i forgot to
>> classify it as such.
>
> can you install 2.6.23 from unst
The results seem to be a little inconsistent in their display. Here's
another panic (on linux-image-2.6.22-3-amd64 version 2.6.22-6~bpo40+1)
and the boot process prior to it:
Starting the hotplug events dispatcher: udevd.
Synthesizing the initial hotplug events...done.
Waiting for /dev to be ful
On Fri, 21 Dec 2007, Paul Gear wrote:
> Hi kernel team,
>
> Just wondering if you have any thoughts on this bug yet. It is a high
> priority bug (as it prevents the system from booting), but i forgot to
> classify it as such.
can you install 2.6.23 from unstable, install just fine on stable.
t
14 matches
Mail list logo
