On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 12:54:57PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 12:16:48PM +0100, Alexander Sack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > yes, while i don't see a big problem requiring embedders to explicitly
> > depend on xulrunner-1.9, I see that we could improve the dpkg
> > inte
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 12:54:57PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 12:16:48PM +0100, Alexander Sack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > yes, while i don't see a big problem requiring embedders to explicitly
> > depend on xulrunner-1.9, I see that we could improve the dpkg
> > inte
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 12:16:48PM +0100, Alexander Sack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> yes, while i don't see a big problem requiring embedders to explicitly
> depend on xulrunner-1.9, I see that we could improve the dpkg
> integration. Using dpkg-shlibdeps would be a choice, yes.
This is how it u
On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 10:08:06PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 01:31:56PM +0100, Alexander Sack wrote:
> > How about shipping like ubuntu, and then switching to a shared glue,
> > once you have a suitable patch? We could even upload as xulrunner-1.9
> > so the transition cou
On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 01:31:56PM +0100, Alexander Sack wrote:
> How about shipping like ubuntu, and then switching to a shared glue,
> once you have a suitable patch? We could even upload as xulrunner-1.9
> so the transition could take some time. But having something in sid
> now would be benefic
On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 07:30:06PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 03:47:17PM +0100, Alexander Sack wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 07:18:54AM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > > On Mon, Nov 05, 2007 at 09:58:17PM +0100, Alexander Sack wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Nov 05, 2007 at 09:50
On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 03:47:17PM +0100, Alexander Sack wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 07:18:54AM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 05, 2007 at 09:58:17PM +0100, Alexander Sack wrote:
> > > On Mon, Nov 05, 2007 at 09:50:53PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Nov 05, 2007 at 09:27
On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 07:18:54AM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 05, 2007 at 09:58:17PM +0100, Alexander Sack wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 05, 2007 at 09:50:53PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > > On Mon, Nov 05, 2007 at 09:27:32PM +0100, Alexander Sack wrote:
> > > > Package: xulrunner
> > > > Se
On Mon, Nov 05, 2007 at 09:58:17PM +0100, Alexander Sack wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 05, 2007 at 09:50:53PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 05, 2007 at 09:27:32PM +0100, Alexander Sack wrote:
> > > Package: xulrunner
> > > Severity: wishlist
> > >
> > > It would be beneficial to unify how xulru
On Mon, Nov 05, 2007 at 09:27:32PM +0100, Alexander Sack wrote:
> Package: xulrunner
> Severity: wishlist
>
> It would be beneficial to unify how xulrunner is packaged across linux
> distributions.
>
> Since upstream is unlikely to adapt the debian way of shipping
> xulrunner for various reasons,
On Mon, Nov 05, 2007 at 09:50:53PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 05, 2007 at 09:27:32PM +0100, Alexander Sack wrote:
> > Package: xulrunner
> > Severity: wishlist
> >
> > It would be beneficial to unify how xulrunner is packaged across linux
> > distributions.
> >
> > Since upstream is
Package: xulrunner
Severity: wishlist
It would be beneficial to unify how xulrunner is packaged across linux
distributions.
Since upstream is unlikely to adapt the debian way of shipping
xulrunner for various reasons, we should follow their idea on how to
ship xulrunner.
A package that could be
12 matches
Mail list logo
