On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 11:19:44AM +0200, Santiago Vila
wrote:
> If I move mailstat out of the PATH, people will submit a
> bug because upgrading to the new package would break
> existing scripts.
>
> The same would happen if I take mailstat out of the
> procmail package.
That's true, yes.
> > W
On Thu, 13 Sep 2007, Jon Dowland wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 10:11:28AM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > Sorry, this is a 17-year old program. This is not time to change the
> > defaults.
>
> Fair enough. Indeed it is, and googling around shows this to be a common
> problem, too. There are ot
On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 10:11:28AM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> Sorry, this is a 17-year old program. This is not time to change the
> defaults.
Fair enough. Indeed it is, and googling around shows this to be a common
problem, too. There are other possible solutions to minimize risk:
* m
Package: procmail
Version: 3.22-16
Severity: important
Mailstat will, by default, truncate the input logfile. I
think this is un-intuitive behaviour that can make
unexpected data loss quite likely. I think the default
behaviour should be as the -k switch toggles, with perhaps
a new command-line sw
4 matches
Mail list logo
