Hi Thomas,
On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 04:57:32PM +0200, Thomas Girard wrote:
> > [0] I don't know how much the API changed. I guess that the standarised
> > CORBA API is still supposed to work as before?
> The C++ mapping conformance was updated to a more recent version, so
> possibly any applica
Le jeudi 18 octobre 2007 à 16:57 +0200, Thomas Girard a écrit :
> According to the Debian Policy[1], we can choose "to support only one
> development version a time". In our case, the libraryname is libomniorb4
> and the SONAME version[2] is changing from 0 to 1.
I forgot to add that given this d
Le jeudi 18 octobre 2007 à 15:21 +0200, Philipp Kern a écrit :
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 02:57:34PM +0200, Thomas Girard wrote:
> > Having thought about this again for a while, I'm no longer convinced we
> > should change the source package name. Indeed, the API was changed, but
> > we are not goin
On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 02:57:34PM +0200, Thomas Girard wrote:
> Having thought about this again for a while, I'm no longer convinced we
> should change the source package name. Indeed, the API was changed, but
> we are not going to support both omniorb4.0 and omniorb4.1.
>
> omnievents, which bui
Hi all,
> is the question if it's (intended to be) fully API compatible, then the
> source package could just me updated.
>
> > The library packages do change name (from foo4 to foo4-1) due to the
> > soname change, so anyone depending on it (i.e. omnievents) will be
> > broken until they are reb
5 matches
Mail list logo
