Bug#429429: [Pkg-samba-maint] Bug#429429: samba: nmbd not always necessary

2007-06-20 Thread Christian Perrier
> That's fair; I'd be happy to make a change like that, but letting users > disable nmbd when the system isn't specifically configured for an AD-only > environment sounds broken to me. Hmm, well, there would be several uses of this and why not leave the choice to our users anyway. I'd vote for s

Bug#429429: [Pkg-samba-maint] Bug#429429: samba: nmbd not always necessary

2007-06-18 Thread Steve Langasek
On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 08:12:56AM -0500, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote: > Steve Langasek wrote: > > On Sun, Jun 17, 2007 at 08:19:43PM -0400, Robert Edmonds wrote: > >> Package: samba > >> Version: 3.0.24-6etch4 > >> Severity: wishlist > >> nmbd is not always necessary; for instance in a non-Windo

Bug#429429: [Pkg-samba-maint] Bug#429429: samba: nmbd not always necessary

2007-06-18 Thread Gerald (Jerry) Carter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Steve Langasek wrote: > On Sun, Jun 17, 2007 at 08:19:43PM -0400, Robert Edmonds wrote: >> Package: samba >> Version: 3.0.24-6etch4 >> Severity: wishlist > >> nmbd is not always necessary; for instance in a non-Windows environment >> with working name