shouldn't this copy be closed as well.
On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 09:52:26AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> clone 422971 -1
> reassign 422971 binutils
> thanks
>
> This patch is applied now for some time (originally taken from the
> Fedora branch); the binutils from the trunk doesn't accept this code
> anymore.
It never should have.
> >
Matthias Klose a écrit :
> clone 422971 -1
> reassign 422971 binutils
> thanks
>
> This patch is applied now for some time (originally taken from the
> Fedora branch); the binutils from the trunk doesn't accept this code
> anymore.
Also note that this patch is applied since version 4.1.1ds2-30, a
Matthias Klose a écrit :
> clone 422971 -1
> reassign 422971 binutils
> thanks
>
> This patch is applied now for some time (originally taken from the
> Fedora branch); the binutils from the trunk doesn't accept this code
> anymore.
>
On my machine, binutils from etch also doesn't accept this cod
clone 422971 -1
reassign 422971 binutils
thanks
This patch is applied now for some time (originally taken from the
Fedora branch); the binutils from the trunk doesn't accept this code
anymore.
Aurelien Jarno writes:
> Package: gcc-4.1
> Version: 4.1.2-6
> Severity: serious
> Justification: no lon
Package: gcc-4.1
Version: 4.1.2-6
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
gcc-4.1 fails to build from source on arm while trying to build libffi:
/build/buildd/gcc-4.1-4.1.2/build/./gcc/xgcc
-B/build/buildd/gcc-4.1-4.1.2/build/./gcc/ -B/usr/arm-linux-gnu/bin/
-B/usr/arm-li
6 matches
Mail list logo
