Bug#420854: bad GPG signature on messages with attachments

2007-05-15 Thread Alain Bench
package mutt close 420854 thanks Hi John-Marc, On Thursday, April 26, 2007 at 14:21:16 -0700, John-Marc Chandonia wrote: > It turned out to be a bug in "textmail" (http://raf.org/textmail/), so > I'll report it to the author. There doesn't seem to be a Debian > package for the program. Th

Bug#420854: bad GPG signature on messages with attachments

2007-04-26 Thread John-Marc Chandonia
On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 12:58:13AM +0200, Alain Bench wrote: > Something on your mail path is doing subtle modifications to passing > messages, instead of transporting them as they are. I'd suspect MTAs, > anti-spam, or most probably your MDA. Last time I saw a similar problem, > the culprit wa

Bug#420854: bad GPG signature on messages with attachments

2007-04-26 Thread Alain Bench
Hello John-Marc, and thanks for this report. On Tuesday, April 24, 2007 at 18:48:02 -0700, John-Marc Chandonia wrote: > When I send a test message to myself without any attachments, the > signature validates correctly. However, if I attach anything to the > message, my signature does not validat

Bug#420854: bad GPG signature on messages with attachments

2007-04-24 Thread John-Marc Chandonia
Package: mutt Version: 1.5.13-3 I'm using mutt 1.5.13-3 and gnupg 1.4.6-2, with the default crypto options from /etc/Muttrc. I have set the following additional options in my muttrc: set crypt_verify_sig=yes set crypt_autosign=yes set crypt_replysign=yes set crypt_replyencrypt=yes set crypt_repl