* Thomas Friedrichsmeier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-06-07 20:57]:
> Well, I did not investigate any further (I did rule out disk cache,
> though), but rkward takes almost twice as long to build as it did
> with 4.1.3. I hope that's not going to be the final state.
Not sure. Some things got slower,
On Thursday 07 June 2007, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> Unfortunately, that version failed to build again and the next one
> too, but now finally a modern version of gcc-snapshot (20070604) has
> successfully been built on i386 and is available on unstable.
Thanks for remembering to drop me a note.
>
* Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-04-03 20:08]:
> > and I'd much rather fix it there (upstream). However, right now I
> > can not test this, as gcc-snapshot (20070326-1 or higher) is not
> > available for my platform (i1386), and I did not succeed in trying
> > to get it to compile.
>
>
* Thomas Friedrichsmeier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-04-03 12:51]:
> Thanks for pointing this out. I assume it does not make too much
> sense to fix this for etch, hence not going to do that.
Yes, there's no rush.
> After the release, a new upstream version will be packaged for sid,
> and I'd much
On Tuesday 03 April 2007 00:18, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> Your package fails to build with GCC 4.3. Version 4.3 has not been
> released yet but I'm building with a snapshot in order to find errors
> and give people an advance warning. In GCC 4.3, the C++ header
> dependencies have been cleaned up
Package: rkward
Version: 0.4.2-2
Usertags: ftbfs-gcc-4.3
Tags: patch
Your package fails to build with GCC 4.3. Version 4.3 has not been
released yet but I'm building with a snapshot in order to find errors
and give people an advance warning. In GCC 4.3, the C++ header
dependencies have been clea
6 matches
Mail list logo
