On Sun, Apr 01, 2007 at 06:58:55PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Sunday 01 April 2007 18:16, Davide Viti wrote:
> > TITLE_PADDING is 8 and is currently computed counting the following
> > chars:
> >
> > 6 - "┌┤ [!]"
> > 2 - "├┐"
>
> No, actually it is (look at the comment):
> 1 - "┤"
> 6 - " [!
On Sunday 01 April 2007 18:16, Davide Viti wrote:
> TITLE_PADDING is 8 and is currently computed counting the following
> chars:
>
> 6 - "┌┤ [!]"
> 2 - "├┐"
No, actually it is (look at the comment):
1 - "┤"
6 - " [!!] "
1 - "├"
(IIRC "[!!]" is used for error dialogs.)
The comment does not m
On Sat, Mar 31, 2007 at 12:42:11PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> > Tried to increase it to "10" with the patch below and title looks ok
> > (see attached screenshot showing trunk vs patched cdebconf)
> > Will hopefully try to understand how sizes are computed early next
> > week.
>
> That still does
On Saturday 31 March 2007 11:58, Davide Viti wrote:
> > This is probably the same issue as in #382278. Not sure why it still
> > does not do the calculation correctly in this case. It could be that
> > "#define TITLE_PADDING 8" is still too low, but it would be nice to
> > know why.
>
> Tried to in
Tags: patch
thanks
On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 05:13:28AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> This is probably the same issue as in #382278. Not sure why it still does
> not do the calculation correctly in this case. It could be that "#define
> TITLE_PADDING 8" is still too low, but it would be nice to know w
reassign 416543 cdebconf-newt-udeb
retitle 416543 [newt] Last letter of the title is cut
thanks
This is probably the same issue as in #382278. Not sure why it still does
not do the calculation correctly in this case. It could be that "#define
TITLE_PADDING 8" is still too low, but it would be ni
6 matches
Mail list logo
