Bug#415651: requires unavailable kernel-patch-adeos

2008-03-07 Thread Malte Cornils
Am Sonntag, den 06.01.2008, 19:44 +0100 schrieb Filippo Giunchedi: > what is the status of this bug? Any change RTAI can be compiled with >= > 2.6.18 ? RTAI upstream has patches up to and including 2.6.24, so it's still a matter of packaging all that sanely. -Malte -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email

Bug#415651: requires unavailable kernel-patch-adeos

2008-01-06 Thread Filippo Giunchedi
Hi, On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 10:44:01PM +0100, Edelhard Becker wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 04:24:53AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > Edelhard, do you have any objection to dropping this package from testing > > immediately given the lack of support for linux 2.6.18? > > no, just dr

Bug#415651: requires unavailable kernel-patch-adeos

2007-03-21 Thread Steve Langasek
On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 10:44:01PM +0100, Edelhard Becker wrote: > On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 04:24:53AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > Edelhard, do you have any objection to dropping this package from testing > > immediately given the lack of support for linux 2.6.18? > no, just drop it and i'll

Bug#415651: requires unavailable kernel-patch-adeos

2007-03-21 Thread Edelhard Becker
Hi, On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 04:24:53AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > Edelhard, do you have any objection to dropping this package from testing > immediately given the lack of support for linux 2.6.18? no, just drop it and i'll try to get it into lenny as suggested. I hope we have more luck with

Bug#415651: requires unavailable kernel-patch-adeos

2007-03-21 Thread Steve Langasek
On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 12:11:40PM +0100, Malte Cornils wrote: > > And the answer is, yes, the kernel-patch-adeos generated from the rtai > > source only supports kernels up to 2.6.8... > And besides, I tried to get 2.6.18 support [1] from upstream for etch, but > upstream does not care much [2]

Bug#415651: requires unavailable kernel-patch-adeos

2007-03-21 Thread Malte Cornils
On Tue, 20 Mar 2007 19:10:46 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > And the answer is, yes, the kernel-patch-adeos generated from the rtai > source only supports kernels up to 2.6.8... And besides, I tried to get 2.6.18 support [1] from upstream for etch, but upstream does not care much [2] about 2.6.18

Bug#415651: requires unavailable kernel-patch-adeos

2007-03-20 Thread Steve Langasek
On Tue, Mar 20, 2007 at 06:42:05PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > But then the question is whether the rtai source package is affected by bug > #378967 as well. If it isn't, then getting a working kernel-patch-adeos > back into etch is as simple as binNMUing rtai for the archs in question; if > i

Bug#415651: requires unavailable kernel-patch-adeos

2007-03-20 Thread Steve Langasek
On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 12:42:07AM +, Filipus Klutiero wrote: > Package: rtai-source > Version: 3.1.0-4 > Severity: grave > > According to README.Debian: > > The Debian rtai source package currently provides four packages, > > 1) rtai-source, which provides the source for the kernel modules

Bug#415651: requires unavailable kernel-patch-adeos

2007-03-20 Thread Filipus Klutiero
Package: rtai-source Version: 3.1.0-4 Severity: grave According to README.Debian: The Debian rtai source package currently provides four packages, 1) rtai-source, which provides the source for the kernel modules, some utility binaries, the userspace libraries (LXRT) and the testsuite. RTAIs al