On Monday 12 March 2007 18:25, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> On 10956 March 1977, Tim Brown wrote:
> > Why package it? Other than the practical uses outlined above, because
> > having binaries on a system outside of the package management system is a
> > PITA to keep track of / update and it makes buildi
On 10956 March 1977, Tim Brown wrote:
> Why package it? Other than the practical uses outlined above, because having
> binaries on a system outside of the package management system is a PITA to
> keep track of / update and it makes building a new system very quick.
Why do I need a package for
> Nope since he that did not go to d-d. Maybe you can outline professional
> uses in the description like done in the previous answers?
As to previous answers, verbatim:
I'm packaging a bunch of security tools that I use in my job pen testing.
There are already a number of people both internall
On Monday 12 March 2007 17:06, you wrote:
> > * Package name: sucrack
> > Version : 1.1
> > Upstream Author : Nico Leidecker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > * URL : http://www.leidecker.info/
> > * License : GPL
> > Programming Lang: C
> > Description : multithre
Am Montag 12 März 2007 17:19 schrieb Tim Brown:
> On Monday 12 March 2007 16:08, Hendrik Sattler wrote:
> > Am Montag 12 März 2007 12:30 schrieb Tim Brown:
> > > Package: wnpp
> > > Severity: wishlist
> > > Owner: Tim Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >
> > > * Package name: sucrack
> > > Version
> * Package name: sucrack
> Version : 1.1
> Upstream Author : Nico Leidecker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://www.leidecker.info/
> * License : GPL
> Programming Lang: C
> Description : multithreaded su bruteforcer
>
> sucrack is a multithreaded Linu
On Monday 12 March 2007 16:08, Hendrik Sattler wrote:
> Am Montag 12 März 2007 12:30 schrieb Tim Brown:
> > Package: wnpp
> > Severity: wishlist
> > Owner: Tim Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > * Package name: sucrack
> > Version : 1.1
> > Upstream Author : Nico Leidecker <[EMAIL PR
Am Montag 12 März 2007 12:30 schrieb Tim Brown:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Tim Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> * Package name: sucrack
> Version : 1.1
> Upstream Author : Nico Leidecker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://www.leidecker.info/
> * License
On Monday 12 March 2007 13:02, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Mar 12, Tim Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > sucrack is a multithreaded Linux/UNIX tool for cracking local user
> > accounts via wordlist bruteforcing su
>
> What is the point of packaging this?
I'm packaging a bunch of security tools tha
On Monday 12 March 2007 13:57, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Mar 12, Tim Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'm packaging a bunch of security tools that I use in my job pen testing.
>
> I do not understand how you would use such a tool in packaged form.
> If you can install a package then obviously yo
On Mar 12, Tim Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm packaging a bunch of security tools that I use in my job pen testing.
I do not understand how you would use such a tool in packaged form.
If you can install a package then obviously you already have root
access, and at that point you can chec
On Mar 12, Tim Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> sucrack is a multithreaded Linux/UNIX tool for cracking local user
> accounts via wordlist bruteforcing su
What is the point of packaging this?
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Tim Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: sucrack
Version : 1.1
Upstream Author : Nico Leidecker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.leidecker.info/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C
Description : multithr
13 matches
Mail list logo
