Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No, it already Suggests it, and that is enough: epstopdf is only a very
> minor part of teTeX and does not warrant a Depends.
I didn't notice that you reported the bug against the sarge version.
For sarge, the answer should have been:
"No, because it Sug
reassign 414473 texlive-base-bin
retitle 414473 texlive-base-bin: Should Suggest/Recommend gs
thanks
Holger Jeromin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The package should depend on gs or gs-gpl because at least epstopdf
> needs this software.
No, it already Suggests it, and that is enough: epstopdf is
Package: tetex-bin
Version: 2.0.2-30sarge4
Severity: minor
The package should depend on gs or gs-gpl because at least epstopdf
needs this software.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.34
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
Versi
3 matches
Mail list logo