reassign 413326 hurd
thanks
Hi,
YAMAMOTO, Hiroyuki, le Sun 04 Mar 2007 21:54:47 +0900, a écrit :
> Samuel Thibault wrote:
> >YAMAMOTO, Hiroyuki, le Sun 04 Mar 2007 14:22:14 +0900, a écrit :
> >
> >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >>
> >>>I also get some other X oddities with the new gnumach pack
Hi,
Samuel Thibault wrote:
YAMAMOTO, Hiroyuki, le Sun 04 Mar 2007 14:22:14 +0900, a écrit :
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I also get some other X oddities with the new gnumach package:
WindowMaker segfaults on startup. And if the session fails to come up
(because of an unrelated problem in
Hi,
YAMAMOTO, Hiroyuki, le Sun 04 Mar 2007 14:22:14 +0900, a écrit :
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >I also get some other X oddities with the new gnumach package:
> >WindowMaker segfaults on startup. And if the session fails to come up
> >(because of an unrelated problem in my strange environment),
clone 413177 -1
title -1 X Restart issues
thanks
Hi,
YAMAMOTO, Hiroyuki, le Sun 04 Mar 2007 14:22:14 +0900, a écrit :
> I repackaged the official souce of gnumach (2:1.3.99.dfsg.cvs20070211-1)
> with replaced
> debian/patches/20_mmx_support.patch and installed it, I confirmed the
> problem solv
Samuel Thibault wrote:
Samuel Thibault, le Sat 03 Mar 2007 21:36:28 +0100, a écrit :
I had to fix the TODO of my patch, it seems to work fine now: please try
to replace debian/patches/20_mmx_support.patch with
http://dept-info.labri.fr/~thibault/tmp/patch-gnumach-mmx
and rebuild the package,
Samuel Thibault, le Sat 03 Mar 2007 21:36:28 +0100, a écrit :
> [EMAIL PROTECTED], le Sat 03 Mar 2007 18:18:16 +0100, a écrit :
> > On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 03:49:40PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > > AFAIK the Debian gnumach package uses 4.1 for a while now. I also have
> > > some local p
[EMAIL PROTECTED], le Sat 03 Mar 2007 18:18:16 +0100, a écrit :
> On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 03:49:40PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > AFAIK the Debian gnumach package uses 4.1 for a while now. I also have
> > some local packages compiled with 4.1 that work OK. But I can try
> > whether the ne
Samuel Thibault wrote:
YAMAMOTO, Hiroyuki, le Sat 03 Mar 2007 10:58:26 +0900, a écrit :
Hi,
Samuel Thibault wrote:
Mmm, that could also be related to the version of gcc that built the
package. Guillem, did you use gcc 4.1 or ?
My environment is as follows:
$ dpkg -l | grep
YAMAMOTO, Hiroyuki, le Sat 03 Mar 2007 10:58:26 +0900, a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> Samuel Thibault wrote:
> >Mmm, that could also be related to the version of gcc that built the
> >package. Guillem, did you use gcc 4.1 or ?
> >
>
> My environment is as follows:
>
> $ dpkg -l | grep gcc
> ii gcc-4.1-
Hi,
Samuel Thibault wrote:
Mmm, that could also be related to the version of gcc that built the
package. Guillem, did you use gcc 4.1 or ?
My environment is as follows:
$ dpkg -l | grep gcc
ii gcc-4.1-base4.1.1-21
ii libgcc14.1.1-21
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL P
Hi,
YAMAMOTO, Hiroyuki, le Sat 03 Mar 2007 10:14:48 +0900, a écrit :
> When the package of gnumach is replaced with version: 2:1.3.99.dfsg.1-1+b1,
> the problem is solved.
> I suggest that this is a problem perhaps related to mouse's I/O.
Mmm, that could also be related to the version of gcc tha
Package: gnumach
Version: 2:1.3.99.dfsg.cvs20070211-1
Severity:
The mouse pointer moves only in the vicinity of the left side and moves only
vertically, when X starts on Hurd.
When the package of gnumach is replaced with version: 2:1.3.99.dfsg.1-1+b1, the
problem is solved.
I suggest that this
12 matches
Mail list logo
