On Sun, Mar 04, 2007 at 08:19:44AM -0500, Theodore Tso wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 09:06:23PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > It's acceptable to me; the final d-i images haven't been spun yet for etch,
> > and anyway a one-line change for a shlibs fix isn't exactly a big delta so I
> > don't
On Sun, Mar 04, 2007 at 02:08:01PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> In this case it is not a problem because, AFAICT, none of the udebs built
> with e2fsprogs are included in any D-I initrd.
> I will reply separately to d-release with my reasons why I feel it would
> be a bad idea if it *had* been inclu
On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 09:06:23PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> It's acceptable to me; the final d-i images haven't been spun yet for etch,
> and anyway a one-line change for a shlibs fix isn't exactly a big delta so I
> don't see a reason to respin even if we did have version skew. (I.e., the
>
On Sunday 04 March 2007 06:06, Steve Langasek wrote:
> It's acceptable to me; the final d-i images haven't been spun yet for
> etch, and anyway a one-line change for a shlibs fix isn't exactly a big
> delta so I don't see a reason to respin even if we did have version
> skew. (I.e., the source req
On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 11:50:54PM -0500, Theodore Tso wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 08:57:40PM +0100, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> > I talked to the release team -- they'd approve a freeze exception
> > for fixing the shlibs entry.
> To the Debian-Release team,
> Could you please con
On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 08:57:40PM +0100, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
>
> I talked to the release team -- they'd approve a freeze exception
> for fixing the shlibs entry.
To the Debian-Release team,
Could you please confirm that you'd approve a freeze exception
to fix the shlibs entry f
On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 01:00:35PM -0500, Theodore Tso wrote:
> The symbol blkid_probe_all_new was added in e2fsprogs 1.38, in May,
> 2005. So I agree, we really should add a versioned depends in blkid's
> shlibs file. I've added it in my sources, so it'll be in the next
> release of e2fsprogs --
On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 03:56:06PM +0100, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> Hm. Ideally I should find out in what version this symbol appeared, and nag
> the libblkid maintainer to add proper shlibs. Theodore, do you have an
> opinion on this -- shouldn't all new packages compiled against libblkid-dev
On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 03:27:06PM +0100, Thomas Constans wrote:
> Libbklid1 was actually installed, but also "on hold", until i "forced"
> the installation. ( i never dist-upgrade, only upgrade ).
>
> This forced installation has upgraded the package to a version
> apparently suitable for the ne
On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 03:03:02PM +0100, Thomas Constans wrote:
> here is the output:
>
> 3680 T blkid_probe_all_new
>
> remember that this package was not installed
Actually, I cannot see how that could be.
moccamaster:~# apt-cache show nfs-kernel-server | grep Depends
Depends: nfs-co
[Please Cc: the bug on replies]
On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 02:33:09PM +0100, Thomas Constans wrote:
>> What version of libblkid1 _do_ you have installed?
> 1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.11.14+dfsg-1
That should be right. What is the output of
nm --dynamic /lib/libblkid.so.1 | grep blkid_probe_all_new
?
/*
On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 01:45:00PM +0100, Thomas Constans wrote:
> /usr/sbin/rpc.mountd: symbol lookup error: /usr/sbin/rpc.mountd:
> undefined symbol: blkid_probe_all_new
Actually, this _is_ slightly weird. There's a dependency there already, but
it's not versioned.
I looked into your original
Le vendredi 02 mars 2007 à 14:08 +0100, Steinar H. Gunderson a écrit :
> On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 01:45:00PM +0100, Thomas Constans wrote:
> > # /usr/sbin/rpc.mountd -d all -F
> > mountd: MNT3(/srv) called
> > mountd: authenticated mount request from maison.opendoor.fr:750
> > for /srv (/srv)
> >
On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 01:45:00PM +0100, Thomas Constans wrote:
> # /usr/sbin/rpc.mountd -d all -F
> mountd: MNT3(/srv) called
> mountd: authenticated mount request from maison.opendoor.fr:750
> for /srv (/srv)
> /usr/sbin/rpc.mountd: symbol lookup error: /usr/sbin/rpc.mountd:
> undefined symb
On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 07:48:08AM +0100, Thomas Constans wrote:
> i got the "bad MNT RPC: RPC:" msg from a macosx laptop whith the
> following command:
> mount -t nfs -o workine:/srv tmp
>
> "workine" being the nfs server.
That explains the funny wording of the error message, at least :-)
> i
On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 11:31:00PM +0100, Thomas Constans wrote:
> after upgrading the mentionned package, exports are no longer working:
>
> I am getting the following messages: "mount_nfs: bad MNT RPC: RPC:
> Unable to receive; errno = Connection reset by peer"
>From where? What command do you
Package: nfs-kernel-server
Version: 1:1.0.12-1
Severity: important
Hello,
after upgrading the mentionned package, exports are no longer working:
I am getting the following messages: "mount_nfs: bad MNT RPC: RPC:
Unable to receive; errno = Connection reset by peer"
Even from localhost, i get a "c
17 matches
Mail list logo
