Bug#411034: 'pngcrush infile outfile' vague wording: 'for outfile'

On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 07:19:55 -0800 Kapil Hari Paranjape <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Perhaps this verbosity should be turned on by a command-line switch. > When we enable that we could also change the message as suggested. That'd be fine too, as long as the wording (long or short) is accurate.

Bug#411034: 'pngcrush infile outfile' vague wording: 'for outfile'

On Thu, 15 Feb 2007, A. Costa wrote: > % ls -log > total 32554 > -rw-r- 1 16638693 Jun 14 2005 Jettaradio0001.png > -rw-r- 1 16562597 Jun 14 2005 Jettaradio0002.png > % pngcrush * > [...] >Recompressing Jettaradio0001.png > [...] >Best p

Bug#411034: 'pngcrush infile outfile' vague wording: 'for outfile'

Package: pngcrush Version: 1.6.4-3 Severity: minor As mentioned before, due to an erroneous man page SYNOPSIS, I ran 'pngcrush *' in a directory with only two files: % ls -log total 32554 -rw-r- 1 16638693 Jun 14 2005 Jettaradio0001.png -rw-r- 1 16562597 Jun 14 2005 Jet