On Wed, 7 Mar 2007, Asheesh Laroia wrote:
On Sun, 11 Feb 2007, Asheesh Laroia wrote:
A Debian user reported this problem with Alpine 0.81 and that it persists
in Alpine 0.82:
The line "addrbook-sort-rule=nickname" in .pinerc hass no effect. The
addressbook will still sorted by the default "
On Sun, 11 Feb 2007, Asheesh Laroia wrote:
A Debian user reported this problem with Alpine 0.81 and that it persists
in Alpine 0.82:
The line "addrbook-sort-rule=nickname" in .pinerc hass no effect. The
addressbook will still sorted by the default "fullname-with-lists-last".
I can report th
A Debian user reported this problem with Alpine 0.81 and that it persists
in Alpine 0.82:
The line "addrbook-sort-rule=nickname" in .pinerc hass no effect. The
addressbook will still sorted by the default "fullname-with-lists-last".
Let me know if there's any more info I can provide. The Deb
On Fri, 9 Feb 2007, Martin Ziegler wrote:
The line "addrbook-sort-rule=nickname"
in .pinerc hass no effect. The addressbook will
still sorted by the default "fullname-with-lists-last".
Martin, can you double-check for me if this is still the case with Alpine
0.82? If so, I'll push it upstrea
Package: alpine
Version: 0.81+dfsg-1
Severity: normal
The line "addrbook-sort-rule=nickname"
in .pinerc hass no effect. The addressbook will
still sorted by the default "fullname-with-lists-last".
Regards,
Martin Ziegler
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
APT prefers testing
APT po
5 matches
Mail list logo
