Bug#408701: [ISC-Bugs #16647] PPC atomic ops

2007-05-20 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Feb 08, Elimar Riesebieter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Built without errors and warnings ;) But I can't test the IBM's RISC > ones, as I have none handy :( I do, and 9.4.1-1 works fine. I think this bug should be closed. -- ciao, Marco signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#408701: [ISC-Bugs #16647] PPC atomic ops

2007-02-08 Thread Elimar Riesebieter
tags 408701 patch thanks On Wed, 07 Feb 2007 the mental interface of Mark Andrews via RT told: > Looking at the assembly it looks like we are using a different > syntax. We are using "r#" where # is the register number. The > rest of the code just uses # (no "r" in front). > > IBM shows code