Bug#406912: tasksel-data: Should add numlockx to desktop

2007-01-16 Thread Joey Hess
Samuel Thibault wrote: > The problem is that both Linux and the X server _clear_ numlock, > whatever the BIOS configuration. Eh, that certianly didn't used to be true on x86 hardware. I don't have any to check right now.. -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#406912: tasksel-data: Should add numlockx to desktop

2007-01-16 Thread Frans Pop
On Tuesday 16 January 2007 16:18, Joey Hess wrote: > I still don't understand why most people will want to configure their > computer to use something different from the bios default. If I want > numlock on, I set it in the bios, then it's always on, even during > early bootup. A program that turns

Bug#406912: tasksel-data: Should add numlockx to desktop

2007-01-16 Thread Samuel Thibault
Joey Hess, le Tue 16 Jan 2007 11:26:01 -0500, a écrit : > Samuel Thibault wrote: > > The problem is that both Linux and the X server _clear_ numlock, > > whatever the BIOS configuration. > > Eh, that certianly didn't used to be true on x86 hardware. I've been noticing this behavior on x86 hardwar

Bug#406912: tasksel-data: Should add numlockx to desktop

2007-01-16 Thread Samuel Thibault
Joey Hess, le Tue 16 Jan 2007 10:18:59 -0500, a écrit : > I still don't understand why most people will want to configure their > computer to use something different from the bios default. If I want > numlock on, I set it in the bios, then it's always on, even during early > bootup. A program that

Bug#406912: tasksel-data: Should add numlockx to desktop

2007-01-16 Thread Joey Hess
Samuel Thibault wrote: > My point is that very _few_ people know that installing numlockx is just > sufficient for having numlock set at bootup, while I guess (maybe that's > only a guess, but neither of us can answer, only polling can) that most > people would prefer numlock set. Or rather: it's

Bug#406912: tasksel-data: Should add numlockx to desktop

2007-01-16 Thread Samuel Thibault
Joey Hess, le Mon 15 Jan 2007 23:19:03 -0500, a écrit : > Samuel Thibault wrote: > > But there's a laptop task, isn't there a way to have it somehow > > "conflict" with numlockx? > > You think the laptop task is installed on all laptops? I'm sure this is > not the case, for various reasons. > > T

Bug#406912: tasksel-data: Should add numlockx to desktop

2007-01-16 Thread Joey Hess
Samuel Thibault wrote: > After installing Debian for a desktop use, numlock is not set by > default, this is a pain for people who have to remember to set it each > time they log in, and they will eventually say "GNU/Linux sucks" just > because of this irritating behavior :) (real story). > > For

Bug#406912: tasksel-data: Should add numlockx to desktop

2007-01-15 Thread Miroslav Kure
On Mon, Jan 15, 2007 at 12:56:14AM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > I'd hence suggest to add the numlockx package to the desktop task. Think about the poor laptop users who will have to turn it off each time they login, because half of the keyboard would be unusable for them. ...and they will e

Bug#406912: tasksel-data: Should add numlockx to desktop

2007-01-15 Thread Samuel Thibault
Miroslav Kure, le Mon 15 Jan 2007 17:38:22 +0100, a écrit : > On Mon, Jan 15, 2007 at 12:56:14AM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > > > I'd hence suggest to add the numlockx package to the desktop task. > > Think about the poor laptop users who will have to turn it off each > time they login, beca

Bug#406912: tasksel-data: Should add numlockx to desktop

2007-01-14 Thread Samuel Thibault
Package: tasksel-data Version: 2.63 Severity: minor Hi, After installing Debian for a desktop use, numlock is not set by default, this is a pain for people who have to remember to set it each time they log in, and they will eventually say "GNU/Linux sucks" just because of this irritating behavior