Bug#406288: Bad call to reload the services

2007-01-11 Thread jacques Normand
On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 12:43:26AM +0200, Sami Haahtinen wrote: > Hmm.. That should be a bug. Atleast according to LSB documentation, > force-reload should be canonical to reload if it's available and restart > if it's not. > > http://www.freestandards.org/spec/booksets/LSB-Core-generic/LSB-Core-g

Bug#406288: Bad call to reload the services

2007-01-10 Thread Sami Haahtinen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jacques Normand wrote: > On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 02:26:46PM -0600, Narayan Desai wrote: >> Sami> I agree here, a simple failback to force-reload would be a >> Sami> simple solution. But on a long term it would be a good idea to >> Sami> catch the

Bug#406288: Bad call to reload the services

2007-01-10 Thread Narayan Desai
> "Sami" == Sami Haahtinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Sami> Narayan Desai wrote: >>> "Sami" == Sami Haahtinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Sami> I agree here, a simple failback to force-reload would be a Sami> simple solution. But on a long term it would be a good idea to Sami> c

Bug#406288: Bad call to reload the services

2007-01-10 Thread Jacques Normand
On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 02:26:46PM -0600, Narayan Desai wrote: > Sami> I agree here, a simple failback to force-reload would be a > Sami> simple solution. But on a long term it would be a good idea to > Sami> catch the errors and report them back to the server and > Sami> possibly attempt r

Bug#406288: Bad call to reload the services

2007-01-10 Thread Sami Haahtinen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Narayan Desai wrote: >> "Sami" == Sami Haahtinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Sami> I agree here, a simple failback to force-reload would be a > Sami> simple solution. But on a long term it would be a good idea to > Sami> catch the errors an

Bug#406288: Bad call to reload the services

2007-01-10 Thread Narayan Desai
> "Sami" == Sami Haahtinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Sami> Thanks (again) for the bug report, passing it on to upstream. Sami> jacques Normand wrote: >> The call used to restart a service is wrong >> (/etc/init.d/ reload). The policy states that the >> support of the reload is opt

Bug#406288: Bad call to reload the services

2007-01-10 Thread Sami Haahtinen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Thanks (again) for the bug report, passing it on to upstream. jacques Normand wrote: > The call used to restart a service is wrong (/etc/init.d/ reload). > The policy states that the support of the reload is optional. And when > bcfg2 fails to reload

Bug#406288: Bad call to reload the services

2007-01-09 Thread jacques Normand
Package: bcfg2 Version: 0.8.6.1-1 Severity: Important Hi, me again, The call used to restart a service is wrong (/etc/init.d/ reload). The policy states that the support of the reload is optional. And when bcfg2 fails to reload a service, it does not report it anywhere. Which is why I consider t