On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 11:34:59PM +0100, Alexander Sack - Debian Bugmail wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 08:46:39AM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 07:45:23PM +0100, Alexander Sack - Debian Bugmail
> > wrote:
> > > sorry for the confusion ... I thought I could reproduce i
On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 08:46:39AM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 07:45:23PM +0100, Alexander Sack - Debian Bugmail
> wrote:
> > sorry for the confusion ... I thought I could reproduce it. Can you
> > please take a look that LANG or LC_TIME work for you too?
>
> it seems to
On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 07:45:23PM +0100, Alexander Sack - Debian Bugmail wrote:
> sorry for the confusion ... I thought I could reproduce it. Can you
> please take a look that LANG or LC_TIME work for you too?
it seems to use LANG rather than LC_TIME.
e.g if i have LANG=en_au and LC_TIME=en_dk.u
tags 402856 - confirmed
thanks
sorry for the confusion ... I thought I could reproduce it. Can you
please take a look that LANG or LC_TIME work for you too?
On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 05:29:38PM +0100, Alexander Sack - Debian Bugmail wrote:
> tags 402856 + confirmed
> thanks
>
> sorry for my previo
tags 402856 + confirmed
thanks
sorry for my previous ignorance ... opening my eyes shows me the
obivous ... this is indeed a bug. Shame on me.
Thanks,
- Alexander
p.s. please take care that the bug is listed as To: or CC: when
replying to this mail (e.g. /reply-all/).
--
GPG message
On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 12:28:39AM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 12:31:14PM +0100, Alexander Sack - Debian Bugmail
> wrote:
> >
> > The date format is taken from LC_TIME ... unless this isn't the case
> > anymore, I don't consider this a bug.
>
> it is a bug as:
>
> a) t
On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 12:31:14PM +0100, Alexander Sack - Debian Bugmail wrote:
>
> The date format is taken from LC_TIME ... unless this isn't the case
> anymore, I don't consider this a bug.
it is a bug as:
a) there's no way for the user to change it
b) other gnome programs don't have this p
On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 04:35:52PM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote:
> Package: icedove
> Version: 1.5.0.8.dfsg1-1
> Severity: wishlist
>
>
> icedove displays mesage dates in MMDDYY format, which is really jarring
> for anyone used to the sane DDMMYY or even saner MMDD formats - it's
> impossible t
Package: icedove
Version: 1.5.0.8.dfsg1-1
Severity: wishlist
icedove displays mesage dates in MMDDYY format, which is really jarring
for anyone used to the sane DDMMYY or even saner MMDD formats - it's
impossible to tell what date is actually being displayed without viewing
enough other dates
9 matches
Mail list logo
