Bug#401657: python-networkx: Recommends python-pydot

2006-12-05 Thread Seo Sanghyeon
On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 06:37:33AM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > 3. pygraphviz and pydot should be alternative, because if you have > > one, you don't need the other. > I don't know much about pydot, but maybe they can conflict is some way, > as they provide the same kind of functionality. Shou

Bug#401657: python-networkx: Recommends python-pydot

2006-12-04 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Hi, (Cc-ing Peter Collingbourne, since he could have some opinion about the point 3. below) Seo Sanghyeon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (05/12/2006): > pygraphviz is not yet in the archive (in NEW), but pydot is, so I > think networkx should declare some sort of relationsip with pydot. I > suggest: I know

Bug#401657: python-networkx: Recommends python-pydot

2006-12-04 Thread Seo Sanghyeon
Package: python-networkx Version: 0.32-1 Severity: normal networkx has two choices for handling Graphviz dot format. One is using pygraphviz and the other is using pydot. pygraphviz is not yet in the archive (in NEW), but pydot is, so I think networkx should declare some sort of relationsip with