Bug#401623: Confirmation

2007-12-16 Thread Tobias Richter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I must say I am not an experienced sysadmin, but I thought I could share > my knowledge. Using postfix as MTA, I simply IGNORE the previous X-DSPAM > headers: > /^(X-DSPAM-.*)/ IGNORE > as an header check rule. You can put in place any workaround you like and

Bug#401623: Confirmation

2007-12-16 Thread Julien Valroff
Le dimanche 16 décembre 2007 à 13:32 +0100, Julien Valroff a écrit : > Hi, > > Le mercredi 06 décembre 2006 à 11:18 -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor a > écrit : > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > At 2006-12-04 23:21, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > > > > > When receiving mail wit

Bug#401623: Confirmation

2007-12-16 Thread Julien Valroff
Hi, Le mercredi 06 décembre 2006 à 11:18 -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor a écrit : > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > At 2006-12-04 23:21, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > > > When receiving mail with X-DSPAM headers already present, > > local dspam adds its own to the bottom. > > I jus

Bug#401623: Confirmation

2006-12-06 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 At 2006-12-04 23:21, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > When receiving mail with X-DSPAM headers already present, > local dspam adds its own to the bottom. I just confirmed this: dspam does not replace already-present X-DSPAM headers on a functioning dspam 3