On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 11:52:02PM +0100, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> No hard feelings, we're just going to fix it for the next release instead, I
> guess. :-)
FWIW, the nfs-utils version currently in experimental (1:1.0.10-6~quilt.1)
now ships without nhfsstone, but the source is still in the u
On Thursday December 14, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 20, 2006 at 05:20:34PM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > No modification required if we remove it from upstream too. Do people
> > use it?
>
> It seems like nobody does, judging from the response. Is there any chance of
> a relativel
On Tue, Dec 19, 2006 at 09:49:36AM +1100, Neil Brown wrote:
>> It seems like nobody does, judging from the response. Is there any chance of
>> a relatively quick 1.0.11 without nhfsstone? We have frozen in Debian at the
>> moment, but fixing such a license bug would probably be allowed past the
>>
On Mon, Nov 20, 2006 at 05:20:34PM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> No modification required if we remove it from upstream too. Do people
> use it?
It seems like nobody does, judging from the response. Is there any chance of
a relatively quick 1.0.11 without nhfsstone? We have frozen in Debian at
I have a copy on my system from 2000...
The terms look like "If you make changes, don't call it nhfsstone".
I guess you'll be ok if you call it nhfsstone-gpl.
marty
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
5 matches
Mail list logo
