Bug#397783: [request-tracker-maintainers] Bug#397783: please document https vs http

2006-11-14 Thread Francesco P. Lovergine
On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 10:29:19PM +0200, Niko Tyni wrote: > Hi, > > thanks for the suggestion. Most of this was already implemented in sarge: > the rt3.4-clients package Recommends libio-socket-ssl-perl and has this > in README.Debian: > > HTTPS > - > > If you want mailgate or the RT CLI

Bug#397783: [request-tracker-maintainers] Bug#397783: please document https vs http

2006-11-14 Thread Niko Tyni
retitle 397783 add a note about debugging deferred mail deliveries found 397783 3.4.5-1 severity 397783 wishlist thanks On Thu, Nov 09, 2006 at 02:43:31PM +0100, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote: > Package: request-tracker3.4 > Severity: normal > > rt-mailgate does use a RPC call to http/https sit

Bug#397783: please document https vs http

2006-11-09 Thread Francesco Paolo Lovergine
Package: request-tracker3.4 Severity: normal rt-mailgate does use a RPC call to http/https site to submit tickets. I lost a few time to debug things like: http://lists.fsck.com/pipermail/rt-devel/2003-February/003086.html at least on sarge. I suspect things are not different on etch+. Please, a