On Nov 25, 2006, at 3:01 PM, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 03:57:25PM -0500, Rick Thomas wrote:
Installing ntp by default (making it have priority "standard") would
be good for the many Debian users who have always-on network access.
But it would be a problem for the minority who
On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 03:57:25PM -0500, Rick Thomas wrote:
>
> Installing ntp by default (making it have priority "standard") would
> be good for the many Debian users who have always-on network access.
> But it would be a problem for the minority who have no or only
> intermittent (e.g.
Op 22-11-2006 om 23:02 schreef Olaf van der Spek:
> There's a checkbox in the Gnome clock applet to enable NTP. But that
> doesn't work if it's not installed and I doubt the average user is
> easily able to install NTP.
Then (ab)use the Gnome clock applet to get NTP installed.
Cheers
Geert Sta
Rick Thomas wrote:
On Nov 22, 2006, at 4:18 PM, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
Rick Thomas wrote:
No network mean the "Network Time Protocol" won't work.
Intermittent network (e.g. dial-up) means that NTP goes for long
periods with no connection to the external time servers. The ntpd
daemon is (
On Nov 22, 2006, at 4:18 PM, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
Rick Thomas wrote:
No network mean the "Network Time Protocol" won't work.
Intermittent network (e.g. dial-up) means that NTP goes for long
periods with no connection to the external time servers. The ntpd
daemon is (mostly) OK with th
Rick Thomas wrote:
No network mean the "Network Time Protocol" won't work.
Intermittent network (e.g. dial-up) means that NTP goes for long periods
with no connection to the external time servers. The ntpd daemon is
(mostly) OK with that, but some auto-dialers may see it's occasional
polls a
On Nov 22, 2006, at 1:05 PM, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
reopen 397649
thanks
Could we have NTP by default?
> But it would be a problem for the minority who have no or only
> intermittent (e.g. dial-up) network access.
Why would it be a problem?
No network mean the "Network Time Protocol" won
Frans Pop wrote:
> On Wednesday 22 November 2006 19:05, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
>> Could we have NTP by default?
>
> Having NTP by default is not a d-i team decision but would better be
> discussed on debian-devel.
Who's decision is it?
--
Olaf van der Spek
http://xccu.sf.net/
--
To UNSUBSCRIB
On Wednesday 22 November 2006 19:05, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> Could we have NTP by default?
Having NTP by default is not a d-i team decision but would better be
discussed on debian-devel.
The option to use ntpdate or similar *during install* to set the hardware
clock is a d-i decision and is s
reopen 397649
thanks
Could we have NTP by default?
> But it would be a problem for the minority who have no or only
> intermittent (e.g. dial-up) network access.
Why would it be a problem?
> I leave it to the PTBs to figure out whether there is a compromise
> position.
PTBs?
--
To UNSUBSCR
On Nov 11, 2006, at 5:24 PM, Geert Stappers wrote:
Op 08-11-2006 om 20:09 schreef Olaf van der Spek:
Also, no NTP synchronization is available by default.
I really think Debian should install.
Maybe install but disable, although I'd prefer it to be enabled by
default.
The Debian-installer
Op 08-11-2006 om 20:09 schreef Olaf van der Spek:
>
> Also, no NTP synchronization is available by default.
> I really think Debian should install.
> Maybe install but disable, although I'd prefer it to be enabled by default.
The Debian-installer installs by default the packages
with priority "sta
12 matches
Mail list logo
