On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 08:04:46PM +, Jochen Voss wrote:
>
> All of these look correct to me. I think you should be fine by just
> using pcre 6.7. Do you agree?
Yeah, I think you're right. I have upgraded to 6.7 for the next version of
Nmap.
Cheers,
-F
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMA
Hi Fyodor,
On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 11:47:23AM -0800, Fyodor wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 05:15:55PM +, Jochen Voss wrote:
> > recently I found some logic errors in nmap's copy of the pcre library.
>
> Thanks for the report. Nmap currently uses LibPCRE 6.4. The latest
> version at www.pc
On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 05:15:55PM +, Jochen Voss wrote:
>
> recently I found some logic errors in nmap's copy of the pcre library.
Thanks for the report. Nmap currently uses LibPCRE 6.4. The latest
version at www.pcre.org is 6.7. I took a quick look at that version
and found that the code
Package: nmap
Version: 4.11-1
Severity: normal
Hello,
recently I found some logic errors in nmap's copy of the pcre library.
1) in the file nmap-4.11/libpcre/pcre_dfa_exec.c (function
internal_dfa_exec, around line 1120) I find the following statement:
int otherd = -1;
if ((ims
4 matches
Mail list logo
