Bug#393323: /lib/resolvconf/list-records missing

2006-10-20 Thread Bill Wohler
Thomas Hood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Does this patch fix things? Yes. Thanks. > Because /etc/init.d/resolvconf is a so-called "conffile", it > _should_ remain behind when the resolvconf package is removed. > (Conffiles are only removed when packages are _purged_.) I see. Isn't it unusual fo

Bug#393323: /lib/resolvconf/list-records missing

2006-10-18 Thread Thomas Hood
Does this patch fix things? --- /etc/init.d/resolvconf_ORIG +++ /etc/init.d/resolvconf @@ -7,6 +7,8 @@ # Don't use set -e; check return status instead +[ -x /sbin/resolvconf ] || exit 0 + MYNAME="${0##*/}" PATH=/sbin:/bin RUN_DIR=/etc/resolvconf/run -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROT

Bug#393323: /lib/resolvconf/list-records missing

2006-10-18 Thread Thomas Hood
tags 393323 confirmed stop Bill Wohler wrote: >> If you remove resolvconf, does the problem return? > > Yes. > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:509]$ sudo aptitude remove resolvconf > ... > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:512]$ sudo /etc/init.d/resolvconf start > Setting up resolvconf...run-parts: /etc/resolvconf/

Bug#393323: /lib/resolvconf/list-records missing

2006-10-17 Thread Bill Wohler
Thomas Hood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Bill Wohler wrote: > > It seems, then, that the root problem was that resolvconf was a > > dependency for a package that was later removed. It looks like it needs > > to be a dependency for an existing package. > > Whether or not some other package depends

Bug#393323: /lib/resolvconf/list-records missing

2006-10-17 Thread Thomas Hood
Bill Wohler wrote: > It seems, then, that the root problem was that resolvconf was a > dependency for a package that was later removed. It looks like it needs > to be a dependency for an existing package. Whether or not some other package depends on resolvconf, resolvconf should not leave a syste