On Sat, Nov 17, 2007 at 04:23:26PM +0200, Mattias Nordstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Ok, so just to be on the clear, an update that would include the three
> line patch on main.c fixes the problem in question?
It appears so; that's the only difference between 0.999-1.0.0-p3-3 and
what I'm run
Ok, so just to be on the clear, an update that would include the three
line patch on main.c fixes the problem in question?
Regards,
Mattias
Mike Markley wrote:
> I've been running the patches suggested in here since July on my backup
> MX without any evidence of problems. In fact, spfmilter's me
I've been running the patches suggested in here since July on my backup
MX without any evidence of problems. In fact, spfmilter's memory
footprint has not budged since I began doing so.
On the other hand, I'm replacing that server with a new one that just
got a fresh etch install. spfmilter crashe
On Tue, Jul 24, 2007 at 03:03:13PM -0700, Mike Markley wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 03:36:27PM -0700, Mike Markley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 04:26:08PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL
> > PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > commenting out the three xfree()s after the refe
On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 03:36:27PM -0700, Mike Markley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 04:26:08PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > commenting out the three xfree()s after the referenced comment stops
> > the crash. I couldn't say whether spfmilter wi
On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 04:26:08PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> commenting out the three xfree()s after the referenced comment stops
> the crash. I couldn't say whether spfmilter will then leak in the
> way that the comment warns ofi (I suspect not), but that would be a
commenting out the three xfree()s after the referenced comment stops
the crash. I couldn't say whether spfmilter will then leak in the
way that the comment warns ofi (I suspect not), but that would be a
less severe bug in my book. I will feedback when I know more about
that question.
scary tho
yes, looks like this is happening in SPF_smtp_from()
and it is the double free that aaron reports in #315196.
it is hard to be sure about the earlier report in that bug,
if that is a different author.
I have a version of this built some time back against
a libspf version slightly before the comme
Package: spfmilter
Version: 1.99+0.95
The spfmilter process dies and the sendmail gateway hangs in a wait. A
attached GDB shows the following:
Program received signal SIGABRT, Aborted.
[Switching to Thread 1098918240 (LWP 9663)]
0x2af2611d in raise () from /lib/libc.so.6
(gdb) bt
#0 0x00
9 matches
Mail list logo