Bug#392517: Please make texlive-doc-en a Recommends

2006-10-17 Thread Frank Küster
Norbert Preining <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You are right, but you missed the point: I am lazy! This way I can have > the same code = call to a shell script in all packages ;-) > > Furthermore: It is *always* easier NOT having directory links, because > if you once want to change them, this is a

Bug#392517: Please make texlive-doc-en a Recommends

2006-10-16 Thread Norbert Preining
Hi Frank! On Mon, 16 Okt 2006, Frank Küster wrote: > Hm, I'm dull again. If the doc packages are all sorted by language, why > would there be more than one link or more than one target with the name > $lang? At least with texlive-doc-en and texlive-doc-de which I have > currently installed, I do

Bug#392517: Please make texlive-doc-en a Recommends

2006-10-16 Thread Frank Küster
Norbert Preining <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] I agree with what you and Ralf proposed. >> Moreover, it seems suboptimal to me that the package installs symlinks >> for each file from /usr/share/texlive-doc/english/somedir to the >> individual files below /usr/share/texlive-doc-en/english.

Bug#392517: Please make texlive-doc-en a Recommends

2006-10-16 Thread Ralf Stubner
Norbert Preining wrote: > About the splitting, see below. Concerning the bug: You are right. So I > will change the relation from depends to suggests? or recommends? What > do you suggest/recommend for now, without splitting!!?!? IMHO this depends on whether or not the meta package texlive should

Bug#392517: Please make texlive-doc-en a Recommends

2006-10-16 Thread Norbert Preining
Hi all! On Don, 12 Okt 2006, Frank Küster wrote: > retitle 392517 texlive-doc-en is too big and too comprehensive for a default > install About the splitting, see below. Concerning the bug: You are right. So I will change the relation from depends to suggests? or recommends? What do you suggest/

Bug#392517: Please make texlive-doc-en a Recommends

2006-10-12 Thread Frank Küster
reopen 392517 retitle 392517 texlive-doc-en is too big and too comprehensive for a default install thanks Ralf Stubner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > However, I can understand the point concerning texlive-doc-en, > especially since there is some highly specialized documentation in > there. Here a

Bug#392517: Please make texlive-doc-en a Recommends

2006-10-12 Thread Ralf Stubner
Michael Biebl wrote: > Package: texlive > Severity: wishlist > > The texlive-doc-en package is rather big (~55mb). If you want to install > texlive instead of tetex and with other packages starting to depend on > texlive | tetex-base, you are forced to install the documentation. > It would be grea

Bug#392517: Please make texlive-doc-en a Recommends

2006-10-11 Thread Michael Biebl
Package: texlive Severity: wishlist The texlive-doc-en package is rather big (~55mb). If you want to install texlive instead of tetex and with other packages starting to depend on texlive | tetex-base, you are forced to install the documentation. It would be great if it was possible to choose if y