Bug#389706: realloc(): invalid next size on startup

2006-09-27 Thread Bernhard R. Link
* Samuel Thibault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [060927 14:06]: > There's something odd in that function: > > size_t buflen = 1000; > char *buffer = malloc(128); Indeed, that is really stupid. Thanks for finding this. Hochachtungsvoll, Bernhard R. Link -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email

Bug#389706: realloc(): invalid next size on startup

2006-09-27 Thread Samuel Thibault
Bernhard R. Link, le Wed 27 Sep 2006 12:40:45 +0200, a écrit : > What window manager are you using? (Perhaps it resizes the window > on startup in a way triggering a bug). fvwm > Do you have any Xresources set that could make a difference? > (take a look at the output of "xrdb -query") Same resu

Bug#389706: realloc(): invalid next size on startup

2006-09-27 Thread Bernhard R. Link
* Samuel Thibault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [060927 11:57]: > I just can't start xfm: as soon as start it, I get > *** glibc detected *** realloc(): invalid next size: 0x08108c60 *** > zsh: abort (core dumped) xfm > > Please tell me if you can't reproduce it, I cannot reproduce it. Neither on i386 no

Bug#389706: realloc(): invalid next size on startup

2006-09-27 Thread Samuel Thibault
Package: xfm Version: 1.5-1 Severity: important Hi, I just can't start xfm: as soon as start it, I get *** glibc detected *** realloc(): invalid next size: 0x08108c60 *** zsh: abort (core dumped) xfm Please tell me if you can't reproduce it, I'll compile a gdb-able version and produce a backtra