Mattia Dongili wrote:
> how do you deal with
>
> [global]
> umlargs=init=/bin/sh mem=256M bla=b
> mem=128M
Uups, didn't think about this.
How does uml handle ... mem=128M mem=256M ... ?
Looks like the last one wins ...
> We could just ship a rootstrap.conf with some clear comment on possible
>
On Tue, September 19, 2006 3:54 pm, Andreas Beckmann said:
> Hi Mattia,
>
>> Isn't a little overkill separating the mem= argument from the others?
>> Since umlargs is already there I'd simply document that one.
>
> For now umlargs is sufficient to set mem.
> Just in case rootstrap someday needs to
Hi Mattia,
> Isn't a little overkill separating the mem= argument from the others?
> Since umlargs is already there I'd simply document that one.
For now umlargs is sufficient to set mem.
Just in case rootstrap someday needs to increase the default mem limit
because oom kills happen to often - th
Hello Andreas!
thanks for all your feedback on rootstrap :)
On Fri, Sep 15, 2006 at 11:09:21PM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
[...]
> rootstrap(1) mentions an 'umlargs' option in rootstrap.conf while
> describing the -u / --umlargs option, but 'umlargs' is neither described
> in rootstrap(1) nor
4 matches
Mail list logo
