Matthew Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes that's the contract you have to sign to be part of Teosto (which you have
> to do if you ever want to make a living in Finland as a musician).
Please, ask Finland's *legislators* if the situation there is really
that anti-competitive closed shop. I
On 3/28/07, Matthew Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes that's the contract you have to sign to be part of Teosto (which you
have
to do if you ever want to make a living in Finland as a musician).
Ouch. As was indicated earlier this seems standard for all performance
rights organisations.
-
On 3/28/07, Andrew Donnellan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 3/28/07, Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Well, it actually seems rather strange to me for an organization which
> > is designed to "protect" artists disallowing artists from determining
> > how their own works are licensed, s
* Don Armstrong:
> Well, it actually seems rather strange to me for an organization which
> is designed to "protect" artists disallowing artists from determining
> how their own works are licensed,
This is common practice for organizations that collect royalties on
behalf of composers. If you wa
On Tue Mar 27 20:54, Jason Spiro wrote:
> 2007/3/27, Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >On Tue, 27 Mar 2007, Jason Spiro wrote:
> >> Maybe if debian-legal or I wrote the license (I have never written a
> >> license before, but maybe I could modify the MIT license) we could
> >> get Teosto to agr
On 3/28/07, Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Well, it actually seems rather strange to me for an organization which
is designed to "protect" artists disallowing artists from determining
how their own works are licensed, so I'm trying to give them the
benifit of the doubt here.
Do they r
On Tue, 27 Mar 2007, Jason Spiro wrote:
> 2007/3/27, Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >On Tue, 27 Mar 2007, Jason Spiro wrote:
> >> Maybe if debian-legal or I wrote the license (I have never written a
> >> license before, but maybe I could modify the MIT license) we could
> >> get Teosto to agr
2007/3/27, Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Tue, 27 Mar 2007, Jason Spiro wrote:
> Maybe if debian-legal or I wrote the license (I have never written a
> license before, but maybe I could modify the MIT license) we could
> get Teosto to agree on more liberal terms than we would get if
> Teos
On Tue, 27 Mar 2007, Jason Spiro wrote:
> Maybe if debian-legal or I wrote the license (I have never written a
> license before, but maybe I could modify the MIT license) we could
> get Teosto to agree on more liberal terms than we would get if
> Teosto wrote one?
The following is what I would use
Hi all, hi Don; thanks for your input.
2007/3/27, Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[parts snipped]
There's really no point to drafting such a license, because it would
not be acceptable for main, and more to the point, Teosto would have
to vet it. Teosto's lawyers should really be the o
First off, thanks to all involved for working through this; legal
stuff is annoying, but getting it right early makes it all worthwhile
in the end.
On Tue, 27 Mar 2007, Jason Spiro wrote:
> We have a question about the default songs for the guitar-simulation
> game Frets On Fire. (We would like t
11 matches
Mail list logo
