John Ellson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (19/07/2006):
> This problem has been fixed in the graphviz-2.9 development series.
> If its important enough to fix in a hurry you should be able to
> backport the fix to graphviz-2.8
Hi all,
sorry, I didn't notice that there was a patch attached for this bug when
Akim Demaille wrote:
I have a quick question: I have tried another dotty on another
machine, and both dotty -V gave the same reference (something
like 96c IIRC). Apparently that information is not sufficient
to find out what real version of code runs. What is the surest
way to find code versio
Akim Demaille wrote:
I have a quick question: I have tried another dotty on another
machine, and both dotty -V gave the same reference (something
like 96c IIRC). Apparently that information is not sufficient
to find out what real version of code runs. What is the surest
way to find code versio
Le 20 juil. 06 à 03:14, John Ellson a écrit :
Akim Demaille wrote:
Actually the problem seems to be that GraphViz used to support
`label'
for graphs, and today it behaves as if it were incorrect.
Not that drastic ;-)
This problem has been fixed in the graphviz-2.9 development series.
Akim Demaille wrote:
Actually the problem seems to be that GraphViz used to support `label'
for graphs, and today it behaves as if it were incorrect.
Not that drastic ;-)
This problem has been fixed in the graphviz-2.9 development series.
If its important enough to fix in a hurry you sho
Actually the problem seems to be that GraphViz used to support `label'
for graphs, and today it behaves as if it were incorrect.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
6 matches
Mail list logo
