Hi everyone!
Am Sonntag, den 30.03.2008, 11:29 -0500 schrieb Dirk Eddelbuettel:
> I went out of the country right after Adam posted his last message. Any news
> on it since? Did anybody have time to test on 32bit? Manuel, could
> you? I am likely to be a bit overwhelmed for next few days...
So
Hi,
On Sun, 2008-03-30 at 11:29 -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I went out of the country right after Adam posted his last message. Any news
> on it since? Did anybody have time to test on 32bit? Manuel, could you? I
> am likely to be a bit overwhelmed for next few days...
I t
Hi guys,
I went out of the country right after Adam posted his last message. Any news
on it since? Did anybody have time to test on 32bit? Manuel, could you? I
am likely to be a bit overwhelmed for next few days...
But *great* to see momentum on this, and I'd like to both second Adam's
noti
On Thu, 2008-03-20 at 09:32 -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-03-20 at 09:31 -0400, Jeff Squyres wrote:
> > On Mar 20, 2008, at 9:17 AM, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> >
> > >> | https://svn.open-mpi.org/svn/ompi/tmp-public/libatomic-ops
> > >
> > > Trouble in paradise. I checked thi
On Mar 20, 2008, at 9:17 AM, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
| https://svn.open-mpi.org/svn/ompi/tmp-public/libatomic-ops
Trouble in paradise. I checked this out, but in the libatomic-ops
directory, opal/include/opal/sys/atomic.h has:
#elif OMPI_ASSEMBLY_ARCH == OMPI_LIBATOMIC_OPS
#include "opa
On Thu, 2008-03-20 at 09:31 -0400, Jeff Squyres wrote:
> On Mar 20, 2008, at 9:17 AM, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
>
> >> | https://svn.open-mpi.org/svn/ompi/tmp-public/libatomic-ops
> >
> > Trouble in paradise. I checked this out, but in the libatomic-ops
> > directory, opal/include/opal/sys/at
On Wed, 2008-03-19 at 21:06 -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> On 19 March 2008 at 20:47, Jeff Squyres wrote:
> | Guess what? Brian sent a long list of thoughts and a patch for "75%
> | of the work" to support libatomic-ops in Open MPI (as a backup for
> | platforms that we don't support with o
On 19 March 2008 at 20:47, Jeff Squyres wrote:
| Guess what? Brian sent a long list of thoughts and a patch for "75%
| of the work" to support libatomic-ops in Open MPI (as a backup for
| platforms that we don't support with our native assembly). The
| remaining 25% requires access to the
Guess what? Brian sent a long list of thoughts and a patch for "75%
of the work" to support libatomic-ops in Open MPI (as a backup for
platforms that we don't support with our native assembly). The
remaining 25% requires access to the platforms that we don't support
-- so perhaps that's a
On Mar 18, 2008, at 12:10 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| What platforms in particular are not supported that Debian wants?
We havevery good success with Open MPI on
i386 amd64 alpha ia64 powerpc sparc
and we are out of luck on
arm[ and a new variant armel with fpu support
On Tue, 2008-03-18 at 11:10 -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> Hi Jeff et al,
>
> Thanks for the follow-up! Lots of good points raised, I'll try to reply 'in
> full' and apologize in advance for the length of the email.
>
> On 18 March 2008 at 08:58, Jeff Squyres wrote:
> | On Mar 11, 2008, at 4:
On Mar 11, 2008, at 4:51 AM, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
[ Jeff/Tim: This is about the outstanding Debian bug report(s)
regarding the
architectures without atomic ops -- where we cannot build Open MPI.
It has
been suggested in the past to try libatomic-ops-dev which seems to
lack one
or two in
Hi Jeff et al,
Thanks for the follow-up! Lots of good points raised, I'll try to reply 'in
full' and apologize in advance for the length of the email.
On 18 March 2008 at 08:58, Jeff Squyres wrote:
| On Mar 11, 2008, at 4:51 AM, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
|
| >> [ Jeff/Tim: This is about the outs
On Sat, 2008-03-08 at 09:30 -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> Hi Adam,
>
> [ Jeff/Tim: This is about the outstanding Debian bug report(s) regarding the
> architectures without atomic ops -- where we cannot build Open MPI. It has
> been suggested in the past to try libatomic-ops-dev which seems t
Hi Adam,
[ Jeff/Tim: This is about the outstanding Debian bug report(s) regarding the
architectures without atomic ops -- where we cannot build Open MPI. It has
been suggested in the past to try libatomic-ops-dev which seems to lack one
or two instructions needed by Open Mpi ]
On 8 March 2008
15 matches
Mail list logo
