Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
[making foo-config a wrapper around pkg-config]
> If you started using pkg-config you'd have introduced a
> build dependancy on a GPL'd program in a BSD licenced package, not
> exactly a good idea.
[...]
That is something I hadn't thought about, gnutls is LGPL. Thank
On 6/30/06, Tollef Fog Heen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is there a reason why gnutls-config and xml2-config aren't just tiny
wrappers around pkg-config for backwards compatibility? IMO, it's
kinda silly to have each package provide its own -config script with
its own set of bugs, rather than havi
* Mike Hommey
| On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 07:38:56PM +0200, Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| > Hello,
| > currently "libgnutls-config --libs"' output looks like this,
| > -L/usr/lib -lgnutls -L/usr/lib -ltasn1 -lgcrypt -lgpg-error
| > listing both direct (-lgnutls) and indirect depende
On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 07:38:56PM +0200, Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hello,
> currently "libgnutls-config --libs"' output looks like this,
> -L/usr/lib -lgnutls -L/usr/lib -ltasn1 -lgcrypt -lgpg-error
> listing both direct (-lgnutls) and indirect dependencies. - Its output
> can
Hello,
currently "libgnutls-config --libs"' output looks like this,
-L/usr/lib -lgnutls -L/usr/lib -ltasn1 -lgcrypt -lgpg-error
listing both direct (-lgnutls) and indirect dependencies. - Its output
can be used for static linking.
I am pondering (and have now been asked by bts) on changing this to
5 matches
Mail list logo