Bug#375077: initrd needs its own, static, nsswitch.conf

2006-08-10 Thread Michael Schultheiss
Bram Duvigneau wrote: > > I have 251-5 installed and am still seeing:  > > udevd[PID]: nss_ldap: failed to bind to LDAP server  > > I had the same problem with 251-5. I used "compat ldap" in my > nsswitch.conf, it will work if you change compat to files. My /etc/nsswitch.conf file already contain

Bug#375077: initrd needs its own, static, nsswitch.conf

2006-07-28 Thread Bram Duvigneau
> I have 251-5 installed and am still seeing:  > udevd[PID]: nss_ldap: failed to bind to LDAP server  I had the same problem with 251-5. I used "compat ldap" in my nsswitch.conf, it will work if you change compat to files. Bram

Bug#375077: initrd needs its own, static, nsswitch.conf

2006-07-17 Thread Michael Schultheiss
reopen 375077 ! kthxbye Stephen Frost wrote: > * Michael Biebl ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > case here? Also, have you tried waiting it out? Each request would end > > > up taking about 2 minutes, but technically it *should* give up > > > eventually.. > > > > I waited for something like 10mi

Bug#375077: initrd needs its own, static, nsswitch.conf

2006-06-26 Thread Stephen Frost
* Michael Biebl ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > case here? Also, have you tried waiting it out? Each request would end > > up taking about 2 minutes, but technically it *should* give up > > eventually.. > > I waited for something like 10min without success. But honestly this > wouldn't be a prope

Bug#375077: initrd needs its own, static, nsswitch.conf

2006-06-25 Thread Sergio Talens-Oliag
El Sun, Jun 25, 2006 at 06:15:51PM +0200, Michael Biebl va escriure: > > Have you tried the configuration proposed on bug#349509?: > > > > passwd: files ldap [UNAVAIL=return] > > group: files ldap [UNAVAIL=return] > > > > It worked for me on a configuration similar to yours. > > Thanks for

Bug#375077: initrd needs its own, static, nsswitch.conf

2006-06-25 Thread Michael Biebl
Stephen Frost wrote: > * Michael Biebl ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: >> Marco d'Itri wrote: >>> On Jun 24, Stephen Frost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> It's simply not possible for libnss-ldap to provide a correct answer before networking or the slapd daemon has been started. I can see abou

Bug#375077: initrd needs its own, static, nsswitch.conf

2006-06-25 Thread Michael Biebl
Sergio Talens-Oliag wrote: > El Sun, Jun 25, 2006 at 12:05:02AM +0200, Michael Biebl va escriure: >> Marco d'Itri wrote: >>> On Jun 24, Stephen Frost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: It's simply not possible for libnss-ldap to provide a correct answer before networking or the slapd daemon has b

Bug#375077: initrd needs its own, static, nsswitch.conf

2006-06-25 Thread Stephen Frost
* Michael Biebl ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Marco d'Itri wrote: > > On Jun 24, Stephen Frost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> It's simply not possible for libnss-ldap to provide a correct answer > >> before networking or the slapd daemon has been started. I can see about > >> making libnss-ld

Bug#375077: initrd needs its own, static, nsswitch.conf

2006-06-25 Thread Sergio Talens-Oliag
El Sun, Jun 25, 2006 at 12:05:02AM +0200, Michael Biebl va escriure: > Marco d'Itri wrote: > > On Jun 24, Stephen Frost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> It's simply not possible for libnss-ldap to provide a correct answer > >> before networking or the slapd daemon has been started. I can see about

Bug#375077: initrd needs its own, static, nsswitch.conf

2006-06-24 Thread Michael Biebl
Marco d'Itri wrote: > On Jun 24, Stephen Frost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> It's simply not possible for libnss-ldap to provide a correct answer >> before networking or the slapd daemon has been started. I can see about >> making libnss-ldap fail faster so that the boot process isn't stopped >

Bug#375077: initrd needs its own, static, nsswitch.conf

2006-06-24 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Jun 24, Stephen Frost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It's simply not possible for libnss-ldap to provide a correct answer > before networking or the slapd daemon has been started. I can see about > making libnss-ldap fail faster so that the boot process isn't stopped > but that's really not a te

Bug#375077: initrd needs its own, static, nsswitch.conf

2006-06-24 Thread Stephen Frost
* Marco d'Itri ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Jun 24, maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > udev does not even know about LDAP, it just uses the libc interface. > > > What do you think it should do? > > > Possibly without horrible layering violations. > > the errors happen when the

Bug#375077: initrd needs its own, static, nsswitch.conf

2006-06-24 Thread maximilian attems
On Sat, Jun 24, 2006 at 11:56:11AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote: > On Jun 24, maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > initramfs build by update-initramfs don't include an /etc/nsswitch.conf > It's not like udev does either, I think you have been a bit too fast in > reassigning this bug. t

Bug#375077: initrd needs its own, static, nsswitch.conf

2006-06-24 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Jun 24, maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > udev does not even know about LDAP, it just uses the libc interface. > > What do you think it should do? > > Possibly without horrible layering violations. > the errors happen when the sysvinit scripts call the udev scripts. > it seems ud

Bug#375077: initrd needs its own, static, nsswitch.conf

2006-06-24 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Jun 24, maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > initramfs build by update-initramfs don't include an /etc/nsswitch.conf It's not like udev does either, I think you have been a bit too fast in reassigning this bug. udev does not even know about LDAP, it just uses the libc interface. What

Bug#375077: initrd needs its own, static, nsswitch.conf

2006-06-24 Thread maximilian attems
reassign udev stop initramfs build by update-initramfs don't include an /etc/nsswitch.conf > INIT: version 2.86 booting > Starting the hotplug events dispatcher: udevd > udevd[374]: nss_ldap: could not connect to any LDAP server as (null) - > Can't contact LDAP server also once INIT is called we