On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 11:33:00PM +0200, Rainer Zocholl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
was heard to say:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED](Daniel Burrows) 14.06.06 19:46
>
>
> > As I understand it, this is a feature request that "aptitude show"
> >should display the currently installed version by default?
>
> Too, y
[EMAIL PROTECTED](Rainer Zocholl) 15.06.06 23:33
Hello, what will happen now?
>[EMAIL PROTECTED](Daniel Burrows) 14.06.06 19:46
>> As I understand it, this is a feature request that "aptitude show"
>>should display the currently installed version by default?
>1st.
>At least it would be requ
[EMAIL PROTECTED](Daniel Burrows) 14.06.06 19:46
> As I understand it, this is a feature request that "aptitude show"
>should display the currently installed version by default?
Too, yes.
But:
1st.
At least it would be required that "aptitude show" does not
declare the first found package a
As I understand it, this is a feature request that "aptitude show"
should display the currently installed version by default?
Daniel
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
micah debian.org(Micah Anderson) 14.06.06 11:56
>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>Hash: SHA1
>reassign 372795 aptitude
>thanks
>Hi,
>Your system seems confused.
Plural! ;-)
All my systems are confused ;-)
(Because all have links to stable and testing both, i assume)
>I am reassigning
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
reassign 372795 aptitude
thanks
Hi,
Your system seems confused. I am reassigning this bug to aptitude, I
might recommend, for further troubleshooting, that you see if apt-cache
policy gives the correct answers.
Also, it helps the person who has to
Package: aptitude
State: installed
Version: 0.2.15.9-2
Priority: important
Hello
"aptitude show" says
Package: aptitude
State: installed
Version: 0.4.1-1.1
but installed is actually 0.2.15.9-2!
The info aptitude delivers are missleading wrong
when the "installed" does not belong to the show
7 matches
Mail list logo
