Well, I have investigated as best as I can. Justin, I
appreciate the bug report, but I just cannot find this
bug. Maybe I am blind to it; or, more likely I think,
there was a momentary bug, not in debram, but in the
sid-version tools you happened to use when you analyzed
debram. If the latter, t
On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 07:23:17PM +, Thaddeus H. Black wrote:
> Please read the log at
> [http://www.bugs/debian.org/372153]. You evidently
> reported this; please follow it up without further
> delay.
>
> Does mail to the Sourceforge address somehow not reach
> you?
It reaches me but I have
Please follow up your Debian bug report # 372153:
"debram: recursive symlinks." Maybe the report is
clear, but somehow it is not clear to me, so I need help
from you to understand it. If there is no bug there, as
I (perhaps mistakenly) think, or if you are unable or
unwilling to provide more info
tags 372153 + moreinfo
stop
On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 10:52:48AM -0400, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> Package: debram
> Version: 0.6.5
> Severity: important
>
> /usr/share/doc/debram-data/cmdsel.txt.gz: Too many levels of symbolic links
> /usr/share/doc/debram-data/maint.txt.gz: Too many levels of symboli
Package: debram
Version: 0.6.5
Severity: important
/usr/share/doc/debram-data/cmdsel.txt.gz: Too many levels of symbolic links
/usr/share/doc/debram-data/maint.txt.gz: Too many levels of symbolic links
/usr/share/doc/debram-data/HISTORY.gz: Too many levels of symbolic links
/usr/share/doc/debram-d
5 matches
Mail list logo
