Bug#369815: [Linux-ha-dev] Re: Bug#369815: ships binary in /etc

2006-06-08 Thread Lars Marowsky-Bree
On 2006-06-08T08:47:41, Alan Robertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >There may be files in there which aren't owned by our package though, or > >modified. > Huh? > > I just meant make individual symlinks for a individual binaries. NOT a > symlink for the entire directory. Ahhh. Ok. I thought y

Bug#369815: [Linux-ha-dev] Re: Bug#369815: ships binary in /etc

2006-06-08 Thread Lars Marowsky-Bree
On 2006-06-08T07:15:01, Alan Robertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>>Unfortunately heartbeat (for fairly broken reasons IMHO) really > >>>needs those files there. > >>Could we symlink 'em somewhere? > >Yes, I think that is a good solution (short of rearanging the > >resource paths completely). I

Bug#369815: [Linux-ha-dev] Re: Bug#369815: ships binary in /etc

2006-06-08 Thread Lars Marowsky-Bree
On 2006-06-08T08:21:38, Alan Robertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>Please fix it everywhere, if you don't mind. > >> > >>Thanks Horms!! > >Of course, special attention needs to be paid to upgrading to (and > >possibly, back off from) a version with that change. > > I'm pretty sure that RPM

Bug#369815: [Linux-ha-dev] Re: Bug#369815: ships binary in /etc

2006-06-08 Thread Alan Robertson
Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote: On 2006-06-08T08:21:38, Alan Robertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Please fix it everywhere, if you don't mind. Thanks Horms!! Of course, special attention needs to be paid to upgrading to (and possibly, back off from) a version with that change. I'm pretty s

Bug#369815: [Linux-ha-dev] Re: Bug#369815: ships binary in /etc

2006-06-08 Thread Alan Robertson
Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote: On 2006-06-08T07:15:01, Alan Robertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Unfortunately heartbeat (for fairly broken reasons IMHO) really needs those files there. Could we symlink 'em somewhere? Yes, I think that is a good solution (short of rearanging the resource paths com

Bug#369815: [Linux-ha-dev] Re: Bug#369815: ships binary in /etc

2006-06-08 Thread Alan Robertson
Horms wrote: On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 11:01:25PM -0600, Alan Robertson wrote: Horms wrote: On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 03:24:48PM +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote: Package: heartbeat Severity: serious Heya, Let's see what the FHS says: "No binaries should be located under /etc." [3.4] Now, wh

Bug#369815: [Linux-ha-dev] Re: Bug#369815: ships binary in /etc

2006-06-07 Thread Horms
On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 11:01:25PM -0600, Alan Robertson wrote: > Horms wrote: > >On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 03:24:48PM +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote: > >>Package: heartbeat > >>Severity: serious > >> > >>Heya, > >> > >>Let's see what the FHS says: > >>"No binaries should be located under /etc."

Bug#369815: [Linux-ha-dev] Re: Bug#369815: ships binary in /etc

2006-06-07 Thread Alan Robertson
Horms wrote: On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 03:24:48PM +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote: Package: heartbeat Severity: serious Heya, Let's see what the FHS says: "No binaries should be located under /etc." [3.4] Now, what does heartbeat do? [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp/he$ dpkg-deb -x heartbeat_1.2.4-8_

Bug#369815: ships binary in /etc

2006-06-05 Thread Stephen Gran
This one time, at band camp, Horms said: > On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 10:46:02AM +0100, Stephen Gran wrote: > > This one time, at band camp, Horms said: > > > > > > Unfortunately heartbeat (for fairly broken reasons IMHO) really > > > needs those files there. > > > > Can't it be a symlink? > > I di

Bug#369815: ships binary in /etc

2006-06-05 Thread Horms
On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 10:46:02AM +0100, Stephen Gran wrote: > This one time, at band camp, Horms said: > > On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 03:24:48PM +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote: > > > Let's see what the FHS says: > > > "No binaries should be located under /etc." [3.4] > > > > > > Now, what does

Bug#369815: ships binary in /etc

2006-06-05 Thread Julien Danjou
On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 05:32:31PM +0900, Horms wrote: > Unfortunately heartbeat (for fairly broken reasons IMHO) really > needs those files there. Any chances to use symlink ? -- Julien Danjou .''`. Debian Developer : :' : http://julien.danjou.info `. `' http://people.debian.org/~acid `-

Bug#369815: ships binary in /etc

2006-06-05 Thread Stephen Gran
This one time, at band camp, Horms said: > On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 03:24:48PM +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote: > > Let's see what the FHS says: > > "No binaries should be located under /etc." [3.4] > > > > Now, what does heartbeat do? > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp/he$ dpkg-deb -x heartbeat_1.2.4-

Bug#369815: ships binary in /etc

2006-06-05 Thread Horms
On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 03:24:48PM +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote: > Package: heartbeat > Severity: serious > > Heya, > > Let's see what the FHS says: > "No binaries should be located under /etc." [3.4] > > Now, what does heartbeat do? > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp/he$ dpkg-deb -x heartbeat_1.2.

Bug#369815: ships binary in /etc

2006-06-01 Thread Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt
Package: heartbeat Severity: serious Heya, Let's see what the FHS says: "No binaries should be located under /etc." [3.4] Now, what does heartbeat do? [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp/he$ dpkg-deb -x heartbeat_1.2.4-8_i386.deb bar [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp/he$ file bar/etc/ha.d/resource.d/IPv6addr bar/etc/ha