Andree Leidenfrost said on Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 08:53:38PM +1000:
> I will commit the patch to stable as I believe it is in line with our
> previous discussion of the topic. I hope that's fine with you.
That's fine with me !
Bruno.
--
Linux Profession Lead EMEA / Open Source Evangelist \
Hi Bruno,
After John's test results (Thanks a lot again, John!) combined with our
discussion, I believe the included patch is a reasonable compromise.
It only doubles the number of tape catalog entries and at the same time
increases the optimal size for the afio files to 16MB for both streaming
a
Hi Andree,
I've done some additional testing with the suggested change to my-stuff.h,
changing the value for:
#define MAX_TAPECATALOG_ENTRIES 4096///< The maximum number of entries in
the tape catalog
...to 8192.
For my purposes, the issue I've reported is resolved between the two parame
Hi John,
Great stuff, thanks a lot for your testing and your feedback!
So, it looks like we can work around the issues by changing some of the
hardcoded parameters. Hopefully, this keep us going until we can make this all
dynmic.
Obviously, I'll be most interest in any further test results you
Hi Andree,
This past weekend has been my first opportunity to work on a new build.
I did a new package build with the following change to libmondo-tools.c:
(IS_THIS_A_STREAMING_BACKUP(bkpinfo->backup_media_type) ? 16 : 16) * 1024;
With that change only, I was able to run a complete backup, boot
Andree Leidenfrost said on Sun, Jun 25, 2006 at 01:57:16PM +1000:
> Thanks a lot for your feedback!
You're welcome.
> Hm, I see what you mean, mountlist_line is 640 bytes + 1 long long int,
> that's certainly too big to go to 65k entries. (s_tapecat_entry is much
> smaller.)
Yeah, just 42 MB fo
Hi Bruno,
Thanks a lot for your feedback!
On Sat, 2006-06-24 at 18:44 +0200, Bruno Cornec wrote:
> Andree Leidenfrost said on Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 01:04:58AM +1000:
>
> > [Bruno: Would be great if you could comment on this one. Looks to me
> > like we may only have to bump up a number, but mayb
Andree Leidenfrost said on Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 01:04:58AM +1000:
> [Bruno: Would be great if you could comment on this one. Looks to me
> like we may only have to bump up a number, but maybe there are
> implications that I'm not aware off...]
Ok.
> Thanks a lot for your bug report and your anal
Hi John,
On Mon, 2006-06-12 at 15:50 -0700, John Nelson wrote:
> Hi Andree,
>
> Thanks very much for getting back to me on this.
Likewise. ;-)
> 64k sounds like a reasonable number, with caveats, of course. 4096 was
> sufficient while using a
> DDS-2 tape drive but not once I upgraded to a DD
Hi Andree,
Thanks very much for getting back to me on this.
64k sounds like a reasonable number, with caveats, of course. 4096 was
sufficient while using a
DDS-2 tape drive but not once I upgraded to a DDS-3 drive. What would happen
with a high-capacity
drive, such as a DLT-S4?
If I could expa
[Bruno: Would be great if you could comment on this one. Looks to me
like we may only have to bump up a number, but maybe there are
implications that I'm not aware off...]
Hi John,
Thanks a lot for your bug report and your analysis of the problem. I
don;t have any experience with tapes and Mondo
11 matches
Mail list logo
