On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 04:52:29PM +0100, Mark Hindley wrote:
> > but does not prevent a malicious user from inserting their own
> > packages into apt-cacher's cache.
>
> Surely that is always a possible problem? Not really related to
> ubuntu/debian name clashes.
You're right; I had confused thi
On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 06:23:33PM +1000, Trent W. Buck wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 08:57:37AM +0100, Mark Hindley wrote:
> > I have just taken over maintaining apt-cacher.
> >
> > This is obviously a major problem that was not envisaged by the
> > design of apt-cacher.
> >
> > I am wonderin
On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 08:57:37AM +0100, Mark Hindley wrote:
> I have just taken over maintaining apt-cacher.
>
> This is obviously a major problem that was not envisaged by the
> design of apt-cacher.
>
> I am wondering if we can get round it by running separate apt-cacher
> daemons on differen
3 matches
Mail list logo
