tag 364845 + wontfix
thanks
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 12:26:11PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 11:11:00PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote:
> > glibc has a build-depends on libc6-dev-amd64 on i386, and libc6-dev-i386 on
> > amd64. This makes bootstrapping difficult.
> >
> > Why
On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 11:11:00PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote:
> glibc has a build-depends on libc6-dev-amd64 on i386, and libc6-dev-i386 on
> amd64. This makes bootstrapping difficult.
>
> Why can't it just use itself? Doesn't it use gcc in standalone mode, so that
> gcc doesn't need any system-in
package: libc6
version: 2.3.6-7
glibc has a build-depends on libc6-dev-amd64 on i386, and libc6-dev-i386 on
amd64. This makes bootstrapping difficult.
Why can't it just use itself? Doesn't it use gcc in standalone mode, so that
gcc doesn't need any system-installed development files?
--
To U
3 matches
Mail list logo